Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Battle of Mataram Sultanate and VOC Against Trunajaya Troops in Kediri (1678) Yuwono, Ardi Tri; Braake, Gijsbert ter
Siginjai: Jurnal Sejarah Vol 5 No 1 (2025): Siginjai: Journal of History
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Sejarah, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/js.v5i1.38476

Abstract

Trunajaya was a descendant of the Madurese rulers who fought the Mataram Sultanate. This resistance was triggered by the actions of Amangkurat I, ruler of the Mataram Sultanate, who in 1659 ordered the massacre of the ulama who supported Prince Danupoyo in an attempt to overthrow his power. In response, Trunajaya launched resistance in Surabaya, which was then under the control of the Mataram Sultanate, but his efforts were unsuccessful. This failure was caused by the support of Amangkurat I from the VOC (Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie), which forced Trunajaya and the rest of his troops to retreat to Kediri. While in Kediri, Trunajaya succeeded in building a new military force which became a threat to the Mataram Sultanate, so that the Mataram Sultanate together with the VOC tried to crush Trunajaya's resistance in Kediri. This research aims to explore further the military campaign carried out by the Mataram Sultanate and the VOC in crushing Trunajaya's resistance in Kediri. This research applies historical methods with a qualitative approach. Between 13 October and 15 November 1678, Mataram Sultanate troops and VOC troops had difficulty entering Kediri due to the strong current of the Brantas River. On November 25, 1678, they succeeded in entering Kediri City and attacked the Trunajaya fort. On the night of November 26, 1678, the Mataram Sultanate and VOC troops achieved victory, forcing Trunajaya and the rest of his troops to flee to Mount Panderman.
Ethics of Writing History in the Axiological Perspective of Pancasila Yuwono, Ardi Tri; Braake, Gijsbert ter; Clumpers, Pieter-Jan
Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): VOLUME 5 ISSUE 2, OCTOBER 2025
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52738/pjk.v5i2.849

Abstract

History is not merely a record of the past but an interpretation that shapes national identity and collective memory. In Indonesia, historical writing often faces challenges, such as political bias, Java-centrism, and narrative injustice, which contradicts the values of Pancasila. This study aims to analyze the relevance of Pancasila as an axiological framework to strengthen integrity and justice in historiographic practices. Using a qualitative approach with a normative framework design, this research examines historiographic texts, through thematic content analysis, hermeneutics, and critical discourse analysis. The findings indicate that Pancasila’s principles, Belief in the One and Only God, Just and Civilized Humanity, The Unity of Indonesia, Democracy guided by wisdom through deliberation and representation, and Social Justice for All the People of Indonesia, offer concrete ethical guidelines for historians. For instance, the principle of Social Justice mandates proportional representation, while Unity demands decentralization of historical narratives beyond Java. Meanwhile, the value of Divinity demands moral integrity in historical verification, the value of Humanity requires dignified representation of all subjects, and the value of Democracy requires inclusive participatory methods. However, the study also identifies challenges, such as political intervention and limited access. The case study of the 1965 Tragedy shows how the official narrative is dominated by a version of the regime that ignores the perspective of the victim and violates the principles of Humanity and Social Justice. This research contributes a critical synthesis of Pancasila values with global historiographical theories, providing an operational framework for ethical historical writing that is both contextually grounded and transformative.
Menafsirkan Agama Melalui Sikap dan Orientasi Keagamaan dalam Masyarakat Jawa pada Masa Orde Baru Yuwono, Ardi Tri; Braake, Gijsbert ter
Lani: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sejarah dan Budaya Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Lani: Jurnal Kajian Sejarah dan Budaya
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/Lanivol6iss2page130-151

Abstract

Religiosity or religious practice reflects the unique characteristics of each religion in the application of its teachings. In Indonesia, especially in Javanese society, religiosity is greatly influenced by local culture. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine religious interpretation through the religious attitudes of the Javanese people during the New Order period (1966-1998). Using an in-depth literature study and critical analysis approach, this study analyzes how the policy of depoliticization and standardization of religion by the state interacts with Javanese syncretic traditions. The findings of this study show that Javanese society is not passive, but develops adaptive and resistant cultural strategies, such as maintaining the slametan tradition, in the midst of homogenization efforts. Religious and cultural elites have an important role in integrating Islamic doctrine with Javanese cosmology, which forms a religious typology that reflects pluralism, eclecticism, and universalism. The attitude and religious orientation of the Javanese people emphasizes sportsmanship, democracy, accommodation, and flexibility in accepting and embracing groups that have beliefs different from their ancestral traditions. Religious practices for the Javanese people are considered part of Pancasila, Bhinneka Tunggal Ika, and nationalism. The Javanese religious concept is when beliefs always go hand in hand with mystical and supernatural things. Javanese people always strive to create balance in the midst of differences, uphold tolerance, and spread peace by respecting the existence of others.