Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Potential for Budget Disharmonization in the Management of the Merah Putih Village Cooperative Adnan Hasanudin; Atik Winanti; Aurora Jilena Meliala
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.660

Abstract

This research aims to determine whether the budget formulation of the Merah Putih Village Cooperative is in accordance with the norms and statutory regulations as stipulated in Law Number 25 of 1992 concerning Cooperatives, particularly in relation to Article 33 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution, which emphasizes the principle of independence in the national economy. The results of this study focus on optimizing the establishment of the Merah Putih Village Cooperative to support the formation of national-scale cooperatives that function not only as savings and loan institutions driving the economy, but also address the challenges and risks that may arise from the establishment of the Merah Putih Cooperative. First, the issue of economic scale is crucial. Operations at the village level are often limited by available resources and market reach. Second, human resource capacity is a determining factor. The management of funds amounting to IDR 3–5 billion requires financial, business, operational, and marketing management skills that are not always present in every village. Experience with Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) shows that one of their main challenges is finding local residents who are truly skilled managers. Third, elite capture or control by local elites can become a bottleneck. In villages with weak governance, influential figures may abuse their authority to control the cooperative for personal gain. Similar occurrences are often found in grant programs from Ministries/Agencies or the private sector, where key individuals dominate and exploit these resources for their own interests. Fourth, the risk of fraud.
Analisis Dampak Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) Terhadap Perlindungan Lingkungan di Indonesia Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution; Adnan Hasanudin; Muhammad Rausyan Fikry; Irwan Triadi
Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Agustus : KONSENSUS : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konsensus.v1i4.245

Abstract

Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) has posed a serious challenge to environmental protection in Indonesia. Cases such as Walhi vs PT Jatim Jaya Perkasa and PT Bumi Mekar Hijau vs the Government of South Sumatra Province and Walhi illustrate how SLAPP is used by corporations to intimidate and silence environmental activists. This article analyzes the mechanisms and strategies of SLAPP as well as its psychological and social impacts. The literature study method is employed to gather data from various sources. The conclusion is that SLAPP not only has legal implications but also imposes heavy psychological and social burdens on activists, including fear, isolation, and social polarization within communities. Therefore, strong legal protection, increased civil society capacity, and cross-sectoral collaboration are needed to combat SLAPP practices and ensure a more conducive environment for sustainable and effective environmental advocacy.