Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Penyuluhan Hukum “Larangan Penolakan Rupiah Logam Dalam Transaksi Jual-Beli Di Kota Ternate” Muhaimin Limatahu; Ahmad Mufti; Fathurrahim
SAFARI :Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): Oktober : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia
Publisher : BADAN PENERBIT STIEPARI PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (806.305 KB) | DOI: 10.56910/safari.v2i4.152

Abstract

The purpose of carrying out community service activities (PkM) at the Faculty Level is so that buyers and traders, who are generally small traders, can get access to information and knowledge regarding the prohibition of rejecting metal rupiah money in buying and selling transactions. The method of implementing pkm at the university level is through the lecture method in the form of counseling / socialization in a blouse to small traders at the location of the implementation of PKM activities. The result of service Everyone is prohibited from refusing to accept Rupiah whose delivery is intended as payment or to settle obligations that must be fulfilled with Rupiah and/or for other financial transactions in the Territory of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, unless there is doubt about the authenticity of the Rupiah as referred to in Article 23 is punished with a maximum of 1 (one) year imprisonment and a maximum fine of Rp200,000,000, 00 (two hundred million rupiah)".
The Urgency Of Shifting The Regulation Of Enforcement Of Fisheries Criminal Laws From Criminal Sanctions To Administrative Sanctions Fathurrahim Fathurrahim; Muhaimin Limatahu; Ahmad Mufti
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.12758

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the urgency of shifting the paradigm of fisheries crime law enforcement from the dominance of criminal sanctions to the strengthening of administrative sanctions. Previous studies have focused more on the effectiveness of criminal sanctions or technical administrative implementation, but have not criticized the dominance of the penal approach, which has led to problems of imbalance in law enforcement, where criminal instruments are used extensively without considering the nature of the offense and the capacity of the perpetrator. This condition has implications for the emergence of legal uncertainty, inefficient judicial burdens, and a lack of corrective effects on the main actors in fisheries crime. This research gap is the main basis for conducting this study. The method used is normative legal research with a legislative, conceptual, and comparative approach, enriched with limited empirical analysis through a review of law enforcement practices and court decisions. The results of the study show that criminal sanctions have so far been ineffective in targeting the main actors (corporations), while administrative sanctions—such as license revocation, administrative fines, and business freezing are more strategic because they are responsive, adaptive, and in line with global practices. However, its effectiveness is still hampered by institutional capacity, accountability in implementation, and unequal treatment between large operators and small-scale fishermen. The research conclusion emphasizes the novelty of offering a reorientation of fisheries law that places administrative sanctions as the primary instrument (primum remedium), while criminal sanctions are positioned selectively as the last resort (ultimum remedium). Thus, this study offers a new conceptual framework that is more progressive, fair, and sustainable in the enforcement of Indonesian fisheries law.