Harahap, Putri Ardhanita
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

MENINGKATKAN KAPABILITAS SISWA DAN GURU SMA MELALUI PEMBINAAN OLIMPIADE MATEMATIKA Harahap, Putri Ardhanita; Dewi, Rivani Adistia; Sitanggang, Damra Ali; Syahbudin, Fauzan; Febriansyah, Muhammad Dwiky; Dahlan, Jarnawi Afgani
JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) Vol 9, No 3 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/jmm.v9i3.31331

Abstract

Abstrak: Banyak sekolah menengah atas (SMA) masih menghadapi tantangan dalam mempersiapkan siswa dan guru untuk mengikuti ajang olimpiade matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kapabilitas akademik siswa dan guru melalui program pembinaan olimpiade yang mencakup diskusi soal-soal olimpiade, pelatihan bagi guru, serta evaluasi efektivitas kegiatan. Kegiatan dilaksanakan secara daring melalui Zoom Meeting pada 19–20 April 2025, dan diikuti oleh 46 peserta dari mitra, yaitu SMA AQL Islamic School 2 Purwakarta, yang terdiri atas siswa kelas X–XII dan guru pendamping. Metode pelaksanaan menggunakan pendekatan interaktif berupa pemaparan materi, simulasi soal, serta diskusi terbuka dengan topik meliputi Geometri, Aljabar, dan Teori Bilangan. Evaluasi dilakukan melalui post-test dan angket kepuasan untuk mengukur pemahaman peserta dan efektivitas program. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa 89,1% peserta mengalami peningkatan pemahaman terhadap materi, dan 93,4% menyatakan puas hingga sangat puas terhadap pelaksanaan kegiatan. Selain itu, 89,1% peserta menilai webinar ini sangat bermanfaat dalam memperluas wawasan dan meningkatkan kesiapan menghadapi kompetisi. Dengan demikian, program ini terbukti efektif dalam meningkatkan kapasitas akademik siswa dan keterampilan guru dalam membimbing peserta olimpiade, serta memberikan kontribusi positif terhadap peningkatan kualitas pendidikan matematika di tingkat SMA.Abstract: Many senior high schools still face challenges in preparing students and teachers for mathematics olympiads. This study aims to enhance the academic capacity of both students and teachers through a training program that includes problem-solving sessions, teacher workshops, and evaluation of program effectiveness. The activity was conducted online via Zoom Meeting on April 19–20, 2025, involving 46 participants from a partner school, SMA AQL Islamic School 2 Purwakarta, consisting of grade 10 to 12 students and accompanying teachers. The program applied an interactive approach, including lectures, problem simulations, and open discussions covering Geometry, Algebra, and Number Theory. Evaluation was carried out through post-tests and satisfaction questionnaires to measure participants' understanding and the overall effectiveness of the program. The results showed that 89.1% of participants experienced improved understanding of the material, and 93.4% expressed satisfaction with the implementation of the activity. Additionally, 89.1% of respondents found the webinar highly beneficial in broadening their knowledge and increasing their readiness for academic competitions. Therefore, this program proved effective in improving both student competencies and teacher mentoring skills, while also contributing positively to the quality of mathematics education at the senior high school level.
Analyzing the Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills of High School Students in Arithmetic: A Gender Differences Harahap, Putri Ardhanita; Dewi, Rivani Adistia; Purniati, Tia
Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Vol 15, No 2 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/jpp.v15i2.pp1142-1156

Abstract

Analyzing the Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills of High School Students in Arithmetic: A Gender Differences. Objective: The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the mathematical critical thinking abilities of senior high school pupils in the field of arithmetic in relation to gender. In particular, it examines the critical thinking patterns of male and female pupils at varying ability levels (high, medium, and low) using four primary indicators: interpretation, analysis, evaluation, and inference. Methods: A qualitative descriptive methodology was implemented. A purposive selection of six tenth-grade students was made from a pool of 31 participants based on the results of an initial critical thinking test. These six pupils represented all three ability categories and both genders. Critical thinking essay assessments, semi-structured interviews, and classroom observations were implemented to accumulate data. The data was analyzed using source triangulation, reduction, and categorization in accordance with Facione's indicators. Findings: The findings indicated that female students exhibited more systematic and circumspect approaches, which led to their success in interpretation and analysis. In contrast, male pupils were more responsive but less meticulous and reflective. In terms of evaluation, the majority of students in all categories did not assess their work, which suggests that they have inadequate metacognitive abilities. Despite the fact that their final answers were accurate, numerous students were unable to articulate explicit conclusions regarding inference. High-ability students exhibited strategic planning and reflective thinking, whereas low-ability students relied on procedural and rote-based methods. Conclusion: The study emphasizes the significance of instructional strategies that are responsive to ability and gender. Integrating mathematical communication, reflection, and explicit training in evaluation and inference are critical components of effective teaching strategies that promote the development of critical thinking. According to the results, female students are more structured and reflective, whereas male students are more evaluative but less quickly. The necessity of instructional designs that are consistent with the unique characteristics of students is suggested by the fact that these differences are influenced by cognitive styles, confidence levels, and learning patterns. Keywords: mathematical critical thinking skills, high school students, gender.
A Study Of Differences In Mathematical Reasoning Among Junior High Students With Field Independent And Field Dependent Cognitive Styles Marjud, Fujiama; Hasanah, Aan; Lukman, Lukman; Harahap, Putri Ardhanita
Mathline : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): Mathline : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/mathline.v10i4.1049

Abstract

Mathematical reasoning plays a vital role in helping students understand concepts, identify patterns, and solve problems effectively. This study aimed to investigate whether students with Field-independent (FI) and Field-dependent (FD) cognitive styles exhibit significant differences in their mathematical reasoning abilities. To examine the variation in students’ reasoning skills according to their cognitive styles, a quantitative approach using a comparative method was employed. After a preliminary test of homogeneity of variances using Levene's Test, which produced a significance value of 0.820 (> 0.05), Data were analyzed using an Independent Samples t-test. The results indicated that the assumption of equal variances was met, thereby validating the use of parametric analysis. The t-test revealed a statistically significant difference between the two cognitive style groups, with a t-value of 3.232, 40 degrees of freedom, and a significance level of 0.002 (< 0.05). In terms of mathematical reasoning, students identified as FI performed better than those classified as FD. This finding suggests that while FD learners tend to rely more on external cues and structured guidance when solving problems, FI learners are generally more analytical and able to process information independently. The findings also suggest that pupils' capacity for mathematical reasoning is significantly influenced by their cognitive style. These results emphasise the necessity of varied teaching strategies that take into account both learning styles from a pedagogical standpoint. Teachers can build more inclusive, balanced, and productive mathematics learning environments by incorporating exploratory, Problem-based tasks are more suitable for FI learners, whereas structured instructional approaches better support FD learners.