Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP)
Silalahi, Thomas Rifera Indraputra
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Pemilik Saham dalam Shareholders Agreement Perusahaan Asuransi Jiwa terhadap Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Nugraha, Dwi; Tanaya, Velliana; Kristanto, Akila Kieyenatama; Elisa Paka, Aldryan Perez; Silalahi, Jordan Baros Indraputra; Silalahi, Thomas Rifera Indraputra
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i5.4792

Abstract

Perlindungan pemilik saham yang mengikatkan diri dalam Shareholders Agreement dalam perusahaan asuransi jiwa memiliki pengaruh pada saat proses pengambilan keputusan, baik dalam perusahaan maupun dalam menghadapi keputusan administrative eksternal. Keputusan merupakan hal terbesar yang pernah dicapai oleh perusahaan-perusahan ini. Solusi hukum yang mampu menjawab kebutuhan dan kepercayaan pemilik saham dalam Shareholders Agreement atau penyelesaian masalah yang muncul baik sesudah atau sebelum perlu dibentuk dari pengamatan regulasi yang tepat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap para pihak Shareholders Agreement dalam perusahaan asuransi Jiwa yang terdampak berdasarkan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara yang diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Negara Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dalam hal ini sebagai objek KTUN dengan menelusuri melalui studi Putusan 475/G/2023/PTUN.JKT. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif yuridis, dengan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Shareholders Agreement lebih memiliki kedudukan yang kuat dalam menentukan hak dan kewajiban pemilik saham. Namun, dalam praktiknya perjanjian ini dapat dipengaruhi oleh peraturan pemerintah dengan menilik surat keputusan yang diterbitkan menjadi KTUN. Berdasarkan hal ini, rumpun administratif PTUN memiliki kompetensi absolut dalam penyelesaian sengketa antara pemilik saham dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan melalui hakim atas Putusan PTUN. Pengaruh dari Putusan PTUN itu sangat memiliki dampak terhadap pembatalan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara yang diterbitkan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Maka dari itu, perlindungan hukum bagi pemilik saham dalam Shareholders Agreement harus mendapatkan kepastian hukum yang lebih kredibel guna mendukung stabilitas dan kepastian hukum dalam manajemen perusahaan asuransi jiwa.
PENERAPAN REVERSE MECHANISM SELECTION DALAM SELEKSI ANGGOTA KPU DAN BAWASLU DEMI TERWUJUDNYA PRINSIP CHECK AND BALANCES Silalahi, Jordan Baros Indraputra; Silalahi, Thomas Rifera Indraputra
PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 13 No 1 (2025): PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kapuas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51826/perahu.v13i1.1483

Abstract

The principle of checks and balances is a fundamental element in a democratic system to ensure a balance of power among state institutions. In the context of selecting members of the General Elections Commission (KPU) and the Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu) in Indonesia, the House of Representatives (DPR) holds the authority to conduct fit and proper tests. This study aims to analyze the role of the DPR in the selection mechanism of KPU and Bawaslu members and to evaluate the extent to which the current mechanism functions effectively. The research method employed is normative legal research with a statutory approach and descriptive analysis of applicable regulations. The findings indicate that although the involvement of the DPR can reinforce the principle of checks and balances, the current selection process still allows room for political intervention and conflicts of interest. To address these issues, this study proposes a Reverse Selection mechanism, which involves reversing the roles between the DPR and the Selection Committee to enhance the independence, transparency, and objectivity of the KPU and Bawaslu selection process. The implementation of this mechanism is expected to improve the governance of electoral body selection in Indonesia.
Reverse Mechanism Selection Sebagai Instrumen Rekonfigurasi Seleksi Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum: Menata Ulang Keterlibatan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Untuk Menjamin Kemandirian Nugraha, Dwi Putra; Silalahi, Jordan Baros Indraputra; Silalahi, Thomas Rifera Indraputra
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 32 No. 2: MEI 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss2.art3

Abstract

The selection process for members of the General Elections Commission (KPU) and the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) in Indonesia plays a strategic role in ensuring the integrity of electoral democracy. Although designed based on the principle of checks and balances, the dominance of the House of Representatives (DPR) in the final stages of the selection process opens up room for political intervention that threatens the independence of the election organisers. This article aims to examine the effectiveness of the current selection design and propose an alternative conceptual model in the form of a reverse mechanism selection, a reversal of the selection authority structure as an instrument for reconstructing a more independent selection governance system. The research method used is normative legal research, with a statutory approach and a comparative analysis of the selection mechanism for election organisers. The results indicate that the final authority held by the DPR without an independent oversight mechanism reduces institutional independence and increases the potential for politicization. Therefore, this article recommends a reconfiguration of authority through a reverse mechanism selection model, in which an independent Selection Team holds final decision-making authority, while the DPR is limited to nominative and administrative functions. This concept provides a conceptual contribution to strengthening the principle of independency of the election organisers and encourages legal reform to increase accountability and neutrality in the selection process.
Co-Authors Dwi Putra Nugraha Elisa Paka, Aldryan Perez Kristanto, Akila Kieyenatama Nugraha, Dwi Silalahi, Jordan Baros Indraputra Velliana Tanaya