Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Paradox of Legal Protection for Kid Influencers and Artists in Indonesia: Comparative Study of Us and France Alfiyah, Andi Besse; Wiranti, Wiranti; Abrar, Ahmad Nugraha; Annisa, Arini Nur; Parawansa, Syarif Saddam Rivanie; Iskandar, Ismail
International Journal of Law Reconstruction Vol 9, No 1 (2025): International Journal of Law Reconstruction
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Every country has to fulfill legal protection for children. In this digital era, social media have positive and negative impacts on children. The number of children using social media is the third highest, namely aged 5-12 years. The economic exploitation of children reaches 431 cases. This study aims to investigate these 3 cases based on the regulation and comparison with other countries. This qualitative research used Normative Jurisprudence, Case Study, and Statue Approaches. Normative Jurisprudence referred to the Child Protection Law and the Employment Law. The case study involved 3 cases and the status approach compared regulations between the United States and France.  This study revealed the urgency of the protection of child labor in the entertainment industry, namely kid influencers and artists who experience legal uncertainty due to the ambiguity and inequality of norms. Elements of the Criminal Act of Child Exploitation were fulfilled with the constraints in the explanation of the "Types of Economic Exploitation Acts" for child influencers or artists. Changes to related laws or legal reform through the Child Labor Law Draft need to consider the United States and France, which have succeeded in providing such protection.
LUKA WARISAN: IMPLIKASI BUDAYA PATRIARKI PADA KASUS KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA DI KABUPATEN BONE A. Aswar; Abrar, Ahmad Nugraha; Hidayat, Rahmat; Suciati , Nani; Wahyuni , Asria
AN-NISA Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bone-Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The low status of women in a patriarchal culture renders them vulnerable to discrimination and violence within both the social and domestic spheres. The Bugis community maintains a wide range of cultural traditions, including a deeply rooted patriarchal paradigm. This imbalance of power relations significantly increases the likelihood of women experiencing violence, particularly domestic violence (KDRT). This article aims to analyze the implications of patriarchal culture in cases of domestic violence within the Bugis community residing in Bone Regency. The research employs an empirical legal method, examining law as written norms while also analyzing legal behavior within society. The findings reveal that the patriarchal culture of the Bugis community in Bone Regency has direct implications for domestic violence. Unequal power relations, restrictions on women’s participation in the social sphere, and the persistence of the siri’ concept, alongside conservative religious interpretations, sustain patriarchal behavior within Bugis society.
Main Hakim Sendiri atas Nama Kesusilaan: Tinjauan Hukum Pidana dan Hak Asasi Manusia terhadap Praktik Penggerebekan Warga di Rumah Sewa Aswar, Andi; Andi Pananrangi, Asia; Andi, Reza Alief; Abrar, Ahmad Nugraha
Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/ekspose.v25i1.11324

Abstract

This study examines the practice of community raids against unmarried couples residing in boarding houses and rented housing, which are often justified in the name of enforcing moral norms. Although such practices are framed as efforts to maintain social order, they raise serious legal concerns when conducted without lawful authority and due process. This study aims to analyze the practice of community raids from the perspectives of criminal law and human rights and to assess whether such actions constitute taking or enforcing the law into one’s own hands, which in modern terms is commonly referred to as vigilantism. This study employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches through the examination of relevant legislation, legal doctrines, and scholarly opinions related to criminal law and human rights. The findings indicate that community raids lack legal authority, may give rise to criminal liability, and violate fundamental human rights, particularly the right to privacy and protection from arbitrary actions. The study emphasizes the necessity of clear normative boundaries on community participation in enforcing morality to ensure consistency with the rule of law and human rights protection.   Fenomena penggerebekan oleh warga terhadap pasangan bukan suami istri di kost dan kontrakan kerap dibenarkan atas dasar penegakan norma kesusilaan. Praktik tersebut, meskipun berangkat dari nilai moral dan ketertiban sosial, menimbulkan persoalan hukum serius ketika dilakukan tanpa kewenangan dan prosedur hukum yang sah. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis praktik penggerebekan warga dari perspektif hukum pidana dan hak asasi manusia serta menilai apakah tindakan tersebut dapat dikualifikasikan sebagai bentuk main hakim sendiri (eigenrichting). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggerebekan warga tidak memiliki dasar kewenangan hukum, berpotensi menimbulkan pertanggungjawaban pidana, serta melanggar hak asasi manusia, khususnya hak atas privasi dan perlindungan dari tindakan sewenang-wenang. Penelitian ini menegaskan perlunya pembatasan normatif terhadap peran warga dalam menjaga ketertiban dan norma kesusilaan agar tetap selaras dengan prinsip negara hukum dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia.