Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal
Tasbih, Muhammad
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kritik Sanad (Naqd Al-Sanad) Dalam Ilmu Hadis: Metodologi dan Implementasinya Mustin, Hilgha; Tasbih, Muhammad; Abdullah, Zaenab
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 3, No 1 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Kritik sanad merupakan instrumen fundamental dalam studi hadis guna memastikan otentisitas dan validitas transmisi ajaran Nabi Muhammad SAW. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan konsep dasar, sejarah perkembangan, metode kritik sanad, serta manfaatnya dalam menjaga kemurnian hadis dari pemalsuan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah studi pustaka, dengan menganalisis literatur primer dan sekunder. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa ulama hadis mengembangkan lima kriteria kritik sanad: kesinambungan sanad (ittisal as-sanad), keadilan perawi (‘adalah), kecermatan perawi (dhabt), tidak menyelisihi riwayat lain (syadz), dan bebas dari cacat tersembunyi (‘illah). Kritik sanad tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai sistem verifikasi, tetapi juga sebagai benteng epistemologis untuk menjaga otoritas ajaran Islam.
Aplikasi Metode Tahlili, Ijmali, dan Maudhu’iy (Tematik) Rijal, Amru; Tasbih, Muhammad; Z, Zaenab
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 3, No 1 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive discussion of three principal methods in hadith studies: the tahlili (analytical), ijmali (concise/global), and maudhu’iy (thematic) approaches. These methodologies are essential for contextual and applicable understanding of hadith. The tahlili method emphasizes a deep analysis of a single hadith, examining both its chain of narration (sanad) and its content (matan); the ijmali method offers a concise and general understanding of hadith; while the maudhu’iy method compiles and analyzes multiple hadiths related to a single theme to produce a holistic thematic comprehension. This research employs a qualitative approach using library research with descriptive and comparative analysis of definitions, application procedures, strengths, and limitations of each method. The paper also presents concrete examples of their application. The findings indicate that each method has distinct advantages and can be strategically combined depending on the research objectives. Methodological understanding is crucial for students and scholars in producing relevant and authoritative hadith studies in response to contemporary challenges.  
Co-Authors Abdullah, Zaenab Mustin, Hilgha Rijal, Amru z, Zaenab