Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementation of Corporate Criminal Accountability in Indonesian National Economic Crime Deny Prabowo; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Muhammad Faiz Hadi; Sagita Ifani Emri; Kaaisar Romolus Deo Sianipar
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.5998

Abstract

Corporations as legal entities have become an integral part of the national economic system. However, behind its contribution to economic growth, not a few corporations are involved in economic crimes such as corruption, tax evasion, money laundering, to monopoly and cartel practices. These corporate crimes have a broad and systemic impact, not only harming the state from a financial perspective, but also damaging a healthy economic order and creating social injustice. In the context of Indonesian criminal law, the implementation of accountability for corporations as perpetrators of criminal acts still faces various challenges, both in terms of regulations, technical law enforcement, and understanding of law enforcement officials. This research aims to evaluate the extent to which the implementation of criminal liability against corporations in cases of national economic crimes as well as identify relevant obstacles and solutions. The method used is a normative juridical approach by examining various laws and regulations, jurisprudence case studies, and related scientific literature. The results show that although the recognition of corporations as subjects of criminal law has been contained in several sectoral laws, its implementation is still partial and has not touched the root of the problem, especially in proving structural corporate guilt. Therefore, there is a need for regulatory reform, strengthening the capacity of law enforcement institutions, and integrating a multidisciplinary approach in dealing with corporate crime. By strengthening criminal accountability towards corporations, it is hoped that the Indonesian criminal law system will be able to provide a deterrent effect while maintaining national economic integrity.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR VICTIMS OF IDENTITY THEFT IN THE CYBER SCOPE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW Deny Prabowo; Muhammad Arif Sahlepi
International Journal of Synergy in Law, Criminal, and Justice Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): SLP-IJSLCJ
Publisher : PT. Sinergi Legal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70321/ijslcj.v2i1.78

Abstract

This study critically and in-depth examines the form and effectiveness of legal protection for victims of cyber identity theft within Indonesia's national criminal law system. Although Indonesia has legal instruments such as the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), and the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP), in reality, victim protection remains very weak, formalistic, and non-operational. Victims of digital crime are left to struggle alone in a legal system that is slow, procedural, and lacks empathy. The offender-centered legal approach marginalizes victims' rights, even though identity theft directly impacts the honor, reputation, and security of citizens. This study uses a normative juridical method with a conceptual approach, analyzing various laws and regulations, victimology theory, legal protection doctrine, and jurisprudence. The results show that in addition to the lack of regulation in the Criminal Code regarding data as an object of crime, there is still fragmentation between institutions, weak digital forensic support, and the absence of an appropriate and victim-friendly recovery mechanism. The state cannot simply provide norms; it must also establish a concrete, swift, and responsive system to ensure that victims of digital crime receive substantive justice. This research confirms that victim protection must be a key agenda for future Indonesian criminal law reform, not merely legalistic discourse ungrounded in reality.