Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
11.316
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JSEH (Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi dan Humaniora) Pembaharuan Hukum Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Akta International Journal of Law Reconstruction The 2nd Proceeding Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Ensiklopedia of Journal Yustisia Merdeka : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Ners Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan) JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research, and Technology (IJSET) Collegium Studiosum Journal Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Jurnal Hukum Legalita Journal of Administrative and Sosial Science (JASS) Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora The International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Technology (ICESST) International Journal of Community Service (IJCS) Indonesia of Journal Business Law JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Research and Science Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Journal of Law Review Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Tut Wuri Handayani : Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora International Journal of Law and Society International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice International Journal of Sociology and Law International Journal Of Synergi In Law, Criminal And Justice Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih
Panca Budi University
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 101 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 101 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Kajian Normatif Tentang Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Di Dunia Maya Saragih, Yasmirah Mandasari; Lubis, Muhammad Ridwan
YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2019): JURNAL YUSTISIA
Publisher : Universitas Merdeka Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine how the validity or legal domicile Electronic Information and Electronic Documents as evidence in the criminal act of defamation in cyberspace as well as to determine the application of the law on criminal acts of defamation in cyberspace. By using the method of normative legal research, it can be concluded that: 1. In the event of the power and value of the evidence, the evidence provided for in Article 184 Criminal Procedure Code, which is the strength of evidence of electronic evidence is free (volledig bewijskracht) and is not binding or specify ( beslissende bewijskracht). Probative value of all evidence based on the judge's assessment. Setting electronic evidence in UU ITE regulated in Chapter III of Information, Document and Electronic Signature, as well as Article 44 of Law ITE. Article 5 (1) of the EIT set explicitly that information or electronic documents and / or printouts are valid evidence. Furthermore, Article 5 (2) states that "Electronic Information and / or Electronic Document and / or printout ... an extension of the valid evidence in accordance with the Law of Procedure applicable in Indonesia". This provision confirms that electronic evidence has been received in evidence in the Indonesian legal system. However, the emphasis of this section is setting elektronlk evidence in the Criminal Procedure Law in Indonesia. 2. For the application of the law, especially criminal sanctions against perpetrators of defamation in cyberspace (cyber), which is where the application of this law in the review of the Penal Code and the Law on ITE. Application of the law on criminal defamation baikinimenggunakan principle of Lex specialist derogat legi generali is where setting defamation in cyberspace regulated in Article 27 paragraph (3) and Article 45 of Law ITE is "Lex specialists" of Article 310 of the Criminal Code that is "Lex generali "which makes synergy relationship rules of law on defamation cases. Defamation cases conducted by Prita Mulyasari in cyberspace since the enactment of new EIT Law became part of the reference. Application of criminal sanctions alone unspecified and may be subject to penalties of imprisonment and fined.
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MAHKOTA WITNESSES (KROON GETUIDE) EVIDENCE ON NARCOTICS ABUSE Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Muhammad Ridwan Lubis
International Journal of Law Reconstruction Vol 5, No 1 (2021): International Journal of Law Reconstruction
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/ijlr.v5i1.15627

Abstract

The use of Mahkota witnesses in Indonesia is still a matter of debate today, both among practitioners and academics, because there is no legal certainty regarding the use of this Mahkota witness. The research method uses juridical normative, the results obtained state that the effectiveness of the presence of Mahkota witnesses is to complete the minimum requirements for evidence to prove someone guilty. Where in the case of narcotics abuse, the lack of evidence found can facilitate the judicial process, the Mahkota witness is used to complete the truth to be revealed or material truth. The Mahkota witness does not affect the severity or lightness of the crime, but its usefulness is as a matter of convincing about the defendant's guilt or whether or not a narcotics abuse is proven. The testimony of the Mahkota witness has the power of proof if it is declared valid as a witness, there is no objection from the defendant's legal adviser regarding the presence of the Mahkota witness and the statement is stated before the court which has been sworn in beforehand and the information given is in accordance with the testimony given by other witnesses or tools other evidence so as to prove the defendant's guilt.
THE EFFORTS OF ERADICATION OF CORRUPTION THROUGH INSTRUMENTS OF MONEY LAUDERING LAW AND RETURN ACTORS’ ASSETS Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the period up to 2015 human rights crimes have evolved into the deprivation of economic rights and social property of the people through political corruption that spreads endemically. Despite the human rights was guaranteed in the 1945 amendments and various other legal devices yet our country has ratified many international conventions on human rights, but human rights violations in a variety of shades and variations remains widespread. This proves that guarantees of protection of human rights in writing still needs to be guarded by the implementation of all national components, especially public institutions such as the media, NGOs, organizations and universities. Refund of state financial in consequence of corruption is an effort to reform and build legal institutions to prevent and combat corruption in international, regional and national levels. Asset recovery efforts must be made by the Indonesian government, because: regarding to the data losses to the state, Indonesia is considered as the country victims of corruption; The corrupted funds are funds that should be devoted in order to improve the prosperity and welfare; Funds taken by the corruptors must be returned as one of the sources of funding in the creation of public welfare; an effort of refund as a preventative measure to potential offenders. Keywords: Corruption, Money Laundering, Asset Refund.
Corporate Criminal Liability for Criminal Acts of Corruption Muhammad Ridwan Lubis; Panca Sarjana Putra; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 8, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v8i1.15234

Abstract

The practice of this criminal act of corruption that involves corporations is an extraordinary crime and is very detrimental to the state. The direct consequences of these crimes to society are financial losses, job losses, and even loss of life due to the crisis. Researchers use normative juridical research methods with 3 (three) approaches to examine two problems discussed with normative research methods. It was found that corporate crime against corruption contained five theories of strict liability according to the law (strict liability) where historically the law began to pay more attention and the principle of absolute responsibility as a punishment needed to prevent retaliation then changed. be a responsibility based on the element of error
The Enforcement of the 2009 Law Number 46 on Corruption Court: The Role of Special Corruption Court Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Berlian Berlian
Sriwijaya Law Review VOLUME 2, ISSUE 2, JULY 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol2.Iss2.69.pp193-202

Abstract

The Corruption Court is an independent special court under the General Court.  The objectives of creating the Corruption Court is, inter alia, to adjudicate the corruption cases, to eliminate the interference of other party involves in corruption cases, to keep the Court runs in the right path.  Herein, in the concept of rule of law, justice principle, under the ideology of Five Principles of Pancasila may only work well if it accompanied with other principles of social, economic, political, ideological, ethnic, racial, religious, color, and even gender background. Hence, the Judges have dual function both as sanction giver but also to deter other people not commit the same crime. In this connection, the preventive measures, such as counseling and providing legal information, as well as socialization of Corruption Law are perceived to be urgent as a new method for Indonesian in combating the corruption.   This study is a normative one but employing empirical- juridical approaches. The normative research was conducted to analyze the theoretical matters of legal principles, while the empirical approach employed in the form of observing the behavior of the suspect of corruption.  The findings of the study shows that the Art. 53 of the 2002 Law Number 30 it was in contradiction to The 1945 Constitution for the corruption cases cannot be tried in two different courts. That is the idea of the establishment of the Corruption Court as a special court besides the so-many corruptions committed in Indonesia where the verdict of the District Court is beyond the people’s justice
Kajian Normatif Tentang Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Di Dunia Maya Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Muhammad Ridwan Lubis
YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): JURNAL YUSTISIA
Publisher : Universitas Merdeka Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33319/yume.v5i1.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine how the validity or legal domicile Electronic Information and Electronic Documents as evidence in the criminal act of defamation in cyberspace as well as to determine the application of the law on criminal acts of defamation in cyberspace. By using the method of normative legal research, it can be concluded that: 1. In the event of the power and value of the evidence, the evidence provided for in Article 184 Criminal Procedure Code, which is the strength of evidence of electronic evidence is free (volledig bewijskracht) and is not binding or specify ( beslissende bewijskracht). Probative value of all evidence based on the judge's assessment. Setting electronic evidence in UU ITE regulated in Chapter III of Information, Document and Electronic Signature, as well as Article 44 of Law ITE. Article 5 (1) of the EIT set explicitly that information or electronic documents and / or printouts are valid evidence. Furthermore, Article 5 (2) states that "Electronic Information and / or Electronic Document and / or printout ... an extension of the valid evidence in accordance with the Law of Procedure applicable in Indonesia". This provision confirms that electronic evidence has been received in evidence in the Indonesian legal system. However, the emphasis of this section is setting elektronlk evidence in the Criminal Procedure Law in Indonesia. 2. For the application of the law, especially criminal sanctions against perpetrators of defamation in cyberspace (cyber), which is where the application of this law in the review of the Penal Code and the Law on ITE. Application of the law on criminal defamation baikinimenggunakan principle of Lex specialist derogat legi generali is where setting defamation in cyberspace regulated in Article 27 paragraph (3) and Article 45 of Law ITE is "Lex specialists" of Article 310 of the Criminal Code that is "Lex generali "which makes synergy relationship rules of law on defamation cases. Defamation cases conducted by Prita Mulyasari in cyberspace since the enactment of new EIT Law became part of the reference. Application of criminal sanctions alone unspecified and may be subject to penalties of imprisonment and fined.
PERLINDUNGAN HAK JANDA PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL ATAS GAJI BEKAS SUAMINYA Muhammad Khambali; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (611.273 KB) | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v10i1.1157

Abstract

Perkawinan ialah ikatan lahir-batin antara seorang pria dengan seorang wanita sebagai suami-isteri dengan tujuan membentuk keluarga (rumah-tangga) yang bahagia dan kekal berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa. Namun jika dalam pergaulan antara suami-isteri tidak dapat mencapai tujuan tersebut, maka perkawinan dapat diputus. Salah satu cara putusnya perkawinan adalah perceraian. Perceraian merupakan suatu malapetaka yang perlu agar tidak menimbulkan malapetaka lain yang lebih besar bahayanya. Perceraian seharusnya hanya dilakukan ketika dalam keadaan darurat untuk tidak menimbulkan mudlarat yang lebih besar. Perceraian berakibat seorang isteri menjadi janda. Pegawai Negeri Sipil pria (suami) yang menceraikan isterinya harus menyerahkan sebagian gajinya untuk penghidupan bekas isterinya (jadanya) dan anak-anak mereka. Pembagian gaji kepada bekas isteri tidak diberikan apabila perceraian disebabkan karena: isteri berzina, dan/atau isteri melakukan kekejaman atau penganiayaan berat baik lahir maupun batin terhadap suami, dan/atau isteri menjadi pemabuk, pemadat, dan penjudi yang sukar disembuhkan, dan/atau isteri telah meninggalkan suami selama 2 (dua) tahun berturut-turut tanpa izin suami dan tanpa alasan yang sah.
PERAN KEJAKSAAN DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA PASCA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (377.601 KB) | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v9i1.802

Abstract

AbstractThe criminal act of corruption in large numbers has the potential to harm the state's finances so as to disrupt development resources and endanger the political stability of a country. Currently corruption is transnational. The prosecutor's office as the case controller or Dominus Litis has a central position in law enforcement, since only the prosecutor's office can determine whether a case can be brought to the Court or not based on valid evidence as per criminal law. To carry out the task of eradicating corruption, the Attorney General can not work alone by relying on the ability of the prosecutor apparatus without cooperation with other agencies. According to the prevailing regulations, corruption investigators are prosecutors and police, so cooperation between the two law enforcers should be mutually supportive and mutually supportive for the successful investigation of criminal acts of corruption.Keywords: Prosecutor, Corruption, Eradication.
Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Terhadap Anak Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Muhamad Romdoni; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih
Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi Vol 2 No 2 (2021): Jurnal Mahupiki Oktober 2021
Publisher : Masyarakat Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (224.788 KB) | DOI: 10.51370/jhpk.v2i2.58

Abstract

Penggunaan teknologi di masa pandemi Covid-19 tidak hanya berdampak positif tetapi juga berdampak negatif. Anak-anak yang menggunakan teknologi tanpa pengawasan dapat mengakses konten pornografi dan membangkitkan rasa ingin tahu untuk mempraktikkannya. Seperti anak dalam Putusan No. 17/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Srg yang melakukan pelecehan seksual terhadap anak lain. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat bentuk pertanggungjawaban atas tindak pidana pencabulan yang dilakukan oleh anak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian yang difokuskan untuk menelaah aturan atau norma dalam ius constitutum. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan hukum dan pendekatan kasus. Berdasarkan penelitian yang telah dilakukan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa unsur kesalahan sangat diperlukan untuk akuntabilitas anak pelaku. Kesalahan yang disengaja (opzet als oogmerk) telah dibuktikan oleh anak pelaku kepada anak korban dengan mengajaknya melakukan hubungan suami istri sebagai motivasinya untuk mempraktekkan konten pornografi yang diakses oleh anak pelaku. Jadi berdasarkan Pasal 81 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2016 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Anak pelaku dipidana dengan pidana penjara 1 (satu) tahun 4 (empat) bulan di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Khusus Anak Tangerang dan Praktek Kerja Lapangan bagi anak pelaku selama 1 (satu) bulan.
KEWENANGAN PENYADAPAN DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Muhammad Arif Sahlepi
Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (250.378 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/hpph.v1i2.5467

Abstract

Aturan hukum mengenai penyadapan tersebut masih tersebar di dibeberapa Undang-Undang. Hal tersebut dikarenakan tidak ada aturan hukum yang secara khusus mengatur mengenai penyadapan. Dikhawatirkan terjadi ketidakpastian hukum yang memiliki kewenangan melakukan penyadapan dan mengenai pengakuan hasil penyadapan sebagai alat bukti. Terlihat adanya pertentangan antara dua kepentingan negara dalam melindungi hak privasi warga negaranya dan kepentingan negara dalam menegakkan hukum. Berdasarkan pertentangan antara dua kepentingan tersebut menyebabkan ada sebagian warga negara yang merasa haknya konstutisionalnya dilanggar dengan adanya tindakan penyadapan. Masyarakat mengajukan Judicial Review atau pengujian kembali terhadap beberapa aturan yang mengatur mengenai penyadapan di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan mahkamah konstitusi tersebut adalah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 006/PUU-I/2003, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 012-016-019/PUU- IV/2006, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 5/PUU-VIII/2010 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis Racio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 5/PUU- VIII/2010 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016 dan menganalisis kewenangan lembaga pemenegak hukum dalam perolehan alat bukti hasil penyadapan pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah Bagaimana Konsep Pengaturan Hukum Penyadapan berbasis Perlindungan Terhadap Hak Privasi Seseorang, kemudian Bagaimana Manfaat terhadap adanya pengaturan Hukum Penyadapan atas pelaku tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Sedangkan penelitian ini adalah dapat dikategorikan menjadi penelitian doktrinal atau disebut juga penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian doktrinal adalah suatu penelitian hukum yang bersifat peskriptif bukan deskriptif sebagaimana ilmu sosial dan ilmu alam. Pendekatan- pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach), pendekatan kasus (statute approach), pendekatan historis (historical approach), pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach), dan pendekatan konseptual (conseptual approach).Kata Kunci : Penyadapan, Tindak pidana korupsi, Kewenangan.
Co-Authors , Rahul Ardian Fikri Abang Anton Abdi Ridho Abdur Rahman Sirait Abdur Rahman Sirait Abu, Roziya Adilman Reliance Lawolo Agam Saputra Antonius Ahbym Faizan Ahmad Novaisal Alwandani Alwandani Angga Sahputra Sirait Ansori Maulana Ardiman Waruwu Ariansyah Ariansyah Arianto Lase Arianus Halawa Armanda, Wahyu Arnovan Pratama Surbakti Aruan, Yulia Christy Shintara Asmita Widimartha Nainggolan Assegaf, Tengku Muhammad Reza Fikri Dharmawan Azhar AR Beny Satria Berlian Berlian Berlian Evi Yenni Pakpahan Bisbon Sibutar-Butar Bisbon Sibutar-Butar Bonar Yudhistira Boniek Juventus Boniek Juventus Chairuni Nasution Dahlia Kusuma Dewi Delianto Habeahan Deny Prabowo Dhermawan, M. Ryan Dicky Yosua Eben Heser Tarigan Eddy Eddy Edisa Putra Ginting Efraim Abigail Bukit Elisabeth Saragih Enus Ginting Eri Siswanto Erwin Efendi Rangkuti Fairuz Ula, Rifqi Faisal Hakim Faruq Rozy Fauzan Fauzan Fauzan fauzan Fauzan Ferry Irmawan Ferry Irmawan Frenki Hamonangan Turnip Ganda Permana Ketaren Gea, Alex Sokhian Geofani Milthree Saragih Gunawan Putra Manihuruk Gunawan, Adinda Julia Haposan Silalahi Haposan Silalahi Harahap, Muhammad Rafandi Hardi Hermawan Haris Putra Utama Limbong Henry Aspan Heronimus Halawa Heru Suhendro Hotlan Wanto Siahaan Hutagalung, Oskar Ibrahim Ibrahim Ilmuwani Lubis Ilmuwani Lubis Irfan Rizky Pradya Irfan Rizky Pradya Isa, Saptha Nugraha Ismaidar I, Ismaidar Israq, Yoldy Iyo Iko Rasaki Juita Novalia Br Barus Juita Novalia Br. Barus Kaaisar Romolus Deo Sianipar Karolus Agung Dery Rianto Karolus Agung Dery Rianto Kartika Septiani ketaren, abdurahman Harits Khaliluddin Khaliluddin Lasma Sinambela M. Luqmannul Hakim Siregar Maisyan Rizaldi Mendrofa, Kevin Manalu, Mogang M.H. Manase Putra Manurung, Heriyanto Manurung, Krismanto Marice Simarmata Mhd. Azhali Siregar Mhd. Azhali Siregar Mitranda Seragih Muhamad ilham Muhamad Romdoni Muhammad Arif Sahlepi Muhammad Aulia Amir Batu Bara Muhammad Azhali Siregar Muhammad Citra Ramadhan Muhammad Faiz Hadi Muhammad Khambali Muhammad Ridwan Lubis Muhammad Safar Mula Sihombing Mulyadi, Mus Nabilah Syaharani Nasution, Ariqh Fahdi Anugrah Ndruru, Restika Nopiana Mozin Nora Elida Manurung Novaisal, Ahmad Nurul Aini Oskar Hutagalung Panca Sarjana Putra Pangaribuan, Christine Natalia Paulus Purba Pintabar, Andar Jimmy Purba , Paulus Purba, Paulus Putriani Nduru Rafianti, Fitri Rahmayanti Rahmayanti Rahmayanti Raja arsyadil fiqry siregar Redyanto Sidi Reza Fazri Prasetyo Rial Pradila Srg Riki Hamdani Riki Hamdany Riki Hamdany Rikson Rikson Riski Darwaman Ritian Handayani Robert Napitupulu Rony, Zahara Tussoleha Ryan Fadli Siregar Ryan Fadli Siregar Sagita Ifani Emri Sani, Ahmad Zaharuddin Sembiring, Ever Scula T. Sembiring, Ferdinand Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua Sihombing, August Saut Maringan Silalahi, Bonari Tua Siregar, Raja Arsyadil Fiqry Sitorus, Tonggo Sony Prayudha Winata Sony Prayudha Winata Sri Devi Zebua Sri Utami Suci Ramadhani, Suci Sudarno Hariadi Nasution Sumarno Sumarno Sumarno Sumarno Suramin Suramin Syavica, Zahrana Tagor Aruan Tamaulina Br Sembiring Tamaulina Br.Sembiring Teguh Hidayat Siregar Teguh Hidayat Siregar Tengku Ikhsan Ansyari Husni Tengku Muhammad Reza Fikri Dharmawan Assegaf Tengku Riza Zarzani N Utari Debora Utrechk Ricardo Utreck Ricardo Utreck Ricardo Welli Nirpa Pasaribu Welli Nirpa Pasaribu Wida Azlina Widya Meilani Willy Novan Prakoso Willy Novan Prakoso Yohnly Boelian Dachban Yoldy Israq Yolla Veronica Sembiring Yossri Mantaw Sihombing Yossri Mantaw Sihombing Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan Yuniel Putra Hulu Zahrana Syavica Zeno Eronu Zalukhu Zeno Eronu Zalukhu Zubaidah Zubaidah