Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Health Sains Jurnal Edukasi Pengabdian Masyarakat: EDUABDIMAS
Muaziz, Agil Abdul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Veterinary

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
EDUKASI PERAN PEMERIKSAAN RADIOGRAFI THORAKS SEBAGAI UPAYA SKRINING KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT DESA BANTERAN Susanto, Fani; Basuki, Samudra Prihatin Hendra; Badharudin, Abid Yanuar; Nadi, Danu Tirta; Ammar, Hanif Dwi; Muaziz, Agil Abdul
Jurnal Edukasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 4 No 3 (2025): JULI 2025
Publisher : FIP UNIRA MALANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36636/eduabdimas.v4i3.7022

Abstract

Five major lung diseases are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, lung and respiratory diseases are a serious global health problem. Global public health targets should prioritize lung health through health screening, which is an essential component in building a healthy society. Chest radiography is a medical screening procedure and assists in clinical diagnosis. The dominant community in Banteran Village, in particular, includes active smokers, mostly men and also have little understanding of the importance of health screening. The purpose of this activity is to educate about the importance of chest radiography in health screening procedures. The activity was carried out by assessing the level of community knowledge about health screening and the success of activities in the leadership cadres of the Muhammadiyah branch Banteran through counseling and lectures on the definition and role of chest radiography as a health screening effort. The results of this activity showed that everyone became more aware of the importance of chest radiography in health screening. With this activity, the community better understands the function of chest radiography as a health screening method and becomes more concerned about preventing disease by implementing a clean and healthy lifestyle.
Comparison of Agatston Score Calculation Between the Syngo.Via Automated Method and the Manual Method in Non-Contrast Cardiac CT Muaziz, Agil Abdul; Utami, Hernastiti Sedya; Oviyanti, Pradana Nur; Supriyadi, Supriyadi; Nugraha, Fathur Rahman
Jurnal Health Sains Vol. 7 No. 4 (2026): Journal Health Sains
Publisher : Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jhs.v7i4.2826

Abstract

In clinical practice, the Agatston Score can be calculated manually or automatically using post-processing software such as Syngo.Via; However, the difference in absolute values between these methods can affect clinical interpretation. The study aimed to compare measurements of the Agatston Score obtained using the Syngo.Via automated method and manual calculations on non-contrast cardiac CT, with an emphasis on measurement differences, suitability, and reliability. A quantitative observational analytical study was conducted using retrospective no-contrast cardiac CT data from 20 subjects. The Agatston score is calculated automatically using Syngo.Via and manually using the Weasis software on the same image dataset. The difference in measurement was analyzed descriptively and tested for normality. Statistical differences were evaluated using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, suitability was evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis, and reliability was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) with a two-way mixed effect model and absolute suitability. Results showed that a difference between the method was not normally distributed and a statistically significant difference in the Agatston score was observed (p < 0.05). The Bland–Altman analysis showed that most of the differences were distributed around the zero line with a few outliers, while the ICC analysis revealed a very high reliability between the two methods (ICC = 1,000). In conclusion, the automatic and manual measurement of the Agatston Score showed excellent reliability and good agreement despite the statistically significant differences in absolute values, suggesting that the two methods could be compared.
Co-Authors Abid Yanuar Badharudin Ammar, Hanif Dwi Basuki, Samudra Prihatin Hendra Fathur Rahman Nugraha Nadi, Danu Tirta Oviyanti, Pradana Nur Supriyadi Supriyadi Susanto, Fani Utami, Hernastiti Sedya