Zuhria, Fristika Maulida Aminatuz
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

HAKIKAT, SUMBER, DAN KLASIFIKASI PENGETAHUAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT DAN ISLAM Zuhria, Fristika Maulida Aminatuz; Barqul Fuadi, Mohammad Nuril; Firdzan Zazuli, Muhammad Alif
Al-Iqro' Vol 2 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54622/aijis.v2i2.498

Abstract

This study aims to examine the nature, sources, and classification of knowledge from the perspectives of Western philosophy and Islamic thought. Using a descriptive qualitative approach through the method of library research, data were collected from relevant primary and secondary literature. The analysis was conducted using historical and thematic approaches by examining philosophical texts as well as classical and contemporary Islamic literature. The findings show that Western philosophy classifies knowledge based on its origins namely empirical (based on experience), rational (based on reason), and intuitive (based on intuition) and distinguishes between a priori knowledge (prior to experience) and a posteriori knowledge (derived from experience). Meanwhile, Islamic epistemology regards revelation, reason, and the senses as complementary sources of knowledge that do not contradict one another. Knowledge in Islam is also classified hierarchically, such as ‘ilm al-yaqīn (knowledge through reliable information), ‘ayn al-yaqīn (knowledge through direct observation), and haqq al-yaqīn (true and certain knowledge). Furthermore, knowledge in Islam is differentiated into naqliyah and aqliyah sciences, fardhu ‘ain and fardhu kifayah obligations, as well as worldly and otherworldly knowledge. Comparatively, Western epistemology tends to be secular and separates the spiritual dimension from the sources of knowledge, whereas Islam integrates the divine dimension throughout the entire epistemic process. Thus, the Islamic paradigm of knowledge is holistic and transcendental, in contrast to the Western approach, which tends to be dualistic and fragmentary. These findings highlight that in Islam, knowledge is not only a means of understanding reality but also a path toward closeness to God and the construction of a meaningful life. This study emphasizes the importance of an integrative approach in understanding and developing knowledge, particularly in addressing the entrenched dichotomy of sciences in contemporary education. In this context, Islamic thought and Western philosophy can, in fact, enrich one another. Although Western epistemology tends to emphasize the rational and empirical aspects while detaching them from the spiritual dimension, the systematic and analytical methods developed in Western traditions can complement the Islamic worldview, which is both transcendental and ethical. By critically and selectively linking the two, it becomes possible to construct a more holistic framework of knowledge one that is not only focused on technical advancement but also spiritually and ethically meaningful for humanity.
The Orientalist Paradigm and Its Implications for Interreligious Dialogue in the Era of Globalization: Paradigma Orientalis dan Implikasinya bagi Dialog Antaragama di Era Globalisasi Ichwayudi, Budi; Syabrowi, Syabrowi; Septiana, Fira; Zuhria, Fristika Maulida Aminatuz
Takwil: Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32939/twl.v4i1.5194

Abstract

Orientalist studies on Islam have played a significant role in shaping Western perceptions and understanding of the religion. Throughout the history of interaction between Islam and the Western world, Orientalist studies have served both as a bridge of knowledge and a field of controversy. As times have evolved, the challenges of pluralism and diversity demand an inclusive and equal platform of communication among religious adherents. This article explores in depth the implications of Orientalist studies on the dynamics of interreligious dialogue in the era of globalization, particularly between Islam and other major world religions. The focus of this article is to analyze both the positive contributions and negative impacts of Orientalist studies, as well as the integration of a moderate approach in responding to the legacy of Orientalism. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method with a literature review approach. The findings reveal that Muslim responses to Orientalist studies are divided into two: some reject them due to perceived hidden agendas, while others accept them with critical reservations as a means of internal reflection and correction. In this context, interreligious dialogue becomes a strategic space to correct misunderstandings and strengthen the values of justice, tolerance, and peace. Orientalist studies have both positive and negative effects on interreligious dialogue. On one hand, biases and misperceptions introduced by Orientalist studies may hinder dialogue and exacerbate prejudice. On the other hand, objective Orientalist studies in the globalized era can enrich interfaith knowledge and open up opportunities for deeper understanding among religious communities.