Royan Hanapi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

HUBUNGAN HUKUM DAN MASYARAKAT Royan Hanapi; Muhammad Aini
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 2 No. 7 (2025): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Edisi Juli 2025)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v2i7.715

Abstract

Because law regulates human behavior, the existence of law in society is very important because of its function. Law is inseparable from society, and vice versa. In addition to acting passively, law actively monitors every individual action and continues to try to change society. To reduce conflict and problems, the laws that apply in society basically come from society itself. So that the law does not conflict with the values of society, the law must always consider juridical, philosophical, and sociological. Society makes laws to create peace, tranquility, and order and provide legal certainty. If the law can function in society, the purpose of law can be felt comprehensively. Therefore, the relationship between law and society is very important. A country without If there is no law, there will be chaos and arbitrary action, likewise if there is no society, the law has no meaning at all.
KOMPARASI REGULASI PERLINDUNGAN DATA PRIBADI DI UNI EROPA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT Royan Hanapi; Owen Hutagalung; Widi Susanto; Indah Dewi Megasari
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 2 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Edisi Desember 2025)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v2i12.1403

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive comparison between the personal data protection regulatory frameworks of the European Union and the United States. The European Union adopts a comprehensive, rights-based approach through the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), emphasizing transparency, accountability, and individual control over personal data. In contrast, the United States employs a hybrid model that combines sector-specific federal regulations with state-level privacy laws such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), resulting in varying levels of protection across sectors and jurisdictions. This article examines key dimensions of both systems, including scope and extraterritorial reach, legal bases for data processing, data subject rights, obligations of data controllers, enforcement mechanisms, and the nature of sanctions. It also explores each system’s approach to cross-border data transfers and analyzes practical implications for global businesses, regulatory bodies, and individuals as data subjects. The findings indicate that the GDPR provides more stringent and harmonized safeguards, whereas the U.S. system offers greater flexibility but remains fragmented. The article concludes by highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of both regulatory models and offering policy recommendations aimed at strengthening data protection while supporting technological advancement and economic innovation in the digital era.