Fitri Nurpita
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kaedah Bahasa Dalam Menafsirkan Al-Qur’an Fitri Nurpita; Alwizar, Alwizar; Kadar, Kadar
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 5: Agustus 2025
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v4i5.10073

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas kaidah-kaidah kebahasaan yang menjadi dasar penting dalam menafsirkan Al-Qur’an. Mengingat Al-Qur’an diturunkan dalam bahasa Arab, maka penguasaan terhadap struktur dan kaidah kebahasaan Arab menjadi keharusan bagi seorang mufassir. Artikel ini menggunakan metode kajian Pustaka, data penelitian dikumpulkan dari berbagai sumber termasuk Al-Qur’an, buku, jurnal ilmiah, dan publikasi relevan lainnya. Dalam tulisan ini, dibahas beberapa aspek utama kebahasaan seperti penggunaan isim dhamir (kata ganti), nakirah dan ma’rifah, bentuk pengulangan kata, kaidah soal-jawab, dan jumlah syartiyah (kalimat bersyarat). Setiap kaedah dijelaskan dengan contoh ayat-ayat Al-Qur’an yang relevan dan dilengkapi dengan penjelasan fungsi serta makna kontekstualnya. Tujuan dari pembahasan ini adalah untuk menegaskan bahwa pemahaman yang benar terhadap kaedah bahasa sangat membantu dalam mengungkap pesan ilahi secara utuh dan menghindarkan dari penafsiran yang menyimpang. Dengan demikian, kaidah kebahasaan menjadi instrumen penting dalam menjaga kemurnian makna Al-Qur’an sebagai sumber utama ajaran Islam.
FALSIFIKASI KARL POPPER: KAJIAN EPISTEMOLOGIS DAN IMPLIKASINYA BAGI METODE PENELITIAN Mely Cahyani; Eva Dewi; Fitri Nurpita
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 02 (2026): Volume 11 Nomor 02, Juni 2026 Published
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i02.54685

Abstract

The philosophy of science plays a crucial role in explaining the foundations of knowledge and the criteria for the scientificity of a theory. One figure who made a significant contribution to this field is Karl Raimund Popper through his theory of falsification. This article aims to examine Karl Popper's thoughts on falsification and analyze their implications for research methods. This research uses a qualitative approach with library research. Data were obtained from various literature sources, such as books, journal articles, and relevant scientific works, and then analyzed using content analysis techniques. The results of the study indicate that Popper rejected the verification principle developed by logical positivism and replaced it with the principle of falsifiability as the primary criterion for a theory's scientificity. According to Popper, a theory is considered scientific if it can be tested, refuted, and potentially proven wrong through empirical testing. Falsification theory also forms the basis for distinguishing science from non-science (pseudo-science). In research, Popper's thinking encouraged a shift from inductive methods to a hypothetical deductive approach that emphasizes critical testing of hypotheses. Thus, falsification theory remains relevant as an epistemological foundation for developing scientific research that is critical, objective, and open to evaluation and knowledge renewal.