Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Ekonomi Syariah pada Pedagang di Taman Merdeka Kota Manna Kabupaten Bengkulu Selatan Emelia Kontesa; Nurul Hak; Padlim Hanif
Economic Reviews Journal Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Economic Reviews Journal
Publisher : Masyarakat Ekonomi Syariah Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56709/mrj.v4i3.822

Abstract

This research aims to understand the application of Islamic economic principles in trading activities at Taman Merdeka, Kota Manna, and to identify the factors influencing the implementation of these principles in the trading activities at Taman Merdeka, Kota Manna. The method employed in this study is a qualitative approach, with data collection conducted through observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis is performed using the Miles and Huberman model.This study analyzes the application of Islamic economic principles among traders at Taman Merdeka, Kota Manna. The findings indicate that traders generally have implemented Islamic economic principles, such as honesty, justice, and avoidance of usury, although their theoretical understanding of these concepts remains limited. The application of these principles is supported by religious awareness, business ethics, a culture of solidarity, as well as supervision and communication among business actors. However, traders also face challenges, such as economic pressure and a lack of understanding of Islamic economic terminology. Nevertheless, they remain committed to maintaining honesty and viewing trading activities as a form of worship in order to achieve blessings in their endeavors.
BEYOND FORMAL PEACE: AN AXIOLOGICAL MEASURE OF VICTIM RECOVERY IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE Dewa Apriyansyah; Wince Wulandari; Marsi Carisa Amalia; Syakilah Triadiani; Emelia Kontesa
Sophist: Jurnal Sosial Politik Kajian Islam dan Tafsir Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): Digital Epistemology, Maqasid Ethics, Socio-Legal Reform, and Civilizational Re
Publisher : Journal Sophist

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/sophist.v8i3.161

Abstract

Restorative justice is often framed as more humane than retribution, but a peace agreement does not guarantee justice if the victim is pressured, the parties stand on unequal footing, or the harm goes unaddressed. This article develops a philosophical measure of recovery quality for victims, offenders, and society, together with safeguards against procedural compromises that overlook victim vulnerability. Using normative legal research with conceptual, statutory, and axiological approaches, it finds that genuine recovery requires six cumulative indicators, voluntary participation, acknowledgment of harm, reparation, protection from pressure, follow-through on agreements, and the recovery of offenders and society, alongside a three-layer safeguard of case selection, process verification, and outcome oversight. The resulting framework repositions the victim as the subject of recovery rather than merely a party who consents to peace, giving law enforcement a concrete basis for assessing whether a restorative settlement is substantively, not just procedurally, complete.