Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

ETIKA DALAM KOMUNIKASI AKADEMIK: MENGHORMATI RAGAM PANDANGAN SEBAGAI PILAR INTELEKTUALITAS Fadil Banu Pramana; Windiyani, Sri; Riska, Dara; Hasibuan, M. Lappo; Astuti, Rahayu Fuji
Jurnal Citra Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Citra Pendidikan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STKIP Citra Bakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38048/jcp.v5i3.5747

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the importance of respecting diverse perspectives as a fundamental pillar in cultivating inclusive, reflective, and ethical intellectualism. In the context of multicultural societies and academic spaces filled with diverse schools of thought, openness to differing opinions is a key indicator of intellectual maturity. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach as outlined by Moleong, aiming to understand the subjective meaning behind social phenomena in a holistic manner. The analysis is grounded in recent literature, including academic journals and books published within the last five years. Findings indicate that respecting differing viewpoints functions not only as an ethical norm but also as a crucial mechanism in the development of critical thinking and scientific culture. Multicultural education, intercultural dialogue, and the values of Pancasila play vital roles in internalizing tolerance in both academic and societal contexts. Therefore, respecting diversity of thought is not merely a moral act, but an integral part of a civilized and intellectually engaged process Abstract This article explores the importance of respecting diverse perspectives as a fundamental pillar in cultivating inclusive, reflective, and ethical intellectualism. In the context of multicultural societies and academic spaces filled with diverse schools of thought, openness to differing opinions is a key indicator of intellectual maturity. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach as outlined by Moleong, aiming to understand the subjective meaning behind social phenomena in a holistic manner. The analysis is grounded in recent literature, including academic journals and books published within the last five years. Findings indicate that respecting differing viewpoints functions not only as an ethical norm but also as a crucial mechanism in the development of critical thinking and scientific culture. Multicultural education, intercultural dialogue, and the values of Pancasila play vital roles in internalizing tolerance in both academic and societal contexts. Therefore, respecting diversity of thought is not merely a moral act, but an integral part of a civilized and intellectually engaged process
ETIKA DALAM KOMUNIKASI AKADEMIK: MENGHORMATI RAGAM PANDANGAN SEBAGAI PILAR INTELEKTUALITAS Fadil Banu Pramana; Windiyani, Sri; Riska, Dara; Hasibuan, M. Lappo; Astuti, Rahayu Fuji
Jurnal Citra Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Citra Pendidikan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STKIP Citra Bakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38048/jcp.v5i3.5747

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the importance of respecting diverse perspectives as a fundamental pillar in cultivating inclusive, reflective, and ethical intellectualism. In the context of multicultural societies and academic spaces filled with diverse schools of thought, openness to differing opinions is a key indicator of intellectual maturity. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach as outlined by Moleong, aiming to understand the subjective meaning behind social phenomena in a holistic manner. The analysis is grounded in recent literature, including academic journals and books published within the last five years. Findings indicate that respecting differing viewpoints functions not only as an ethical norm but also as a crucial mechanism in the development of critical thinking and scientific culture. Multicultural education, intercultural dialogue, and the values of Pancasila play vital roles in internalizing tolerance in both academic and societal contexts. Therefore, respecting diversity of thought is not merely a moral act, but an integral part of a civilized and intellectually engaged process Abstract This article explores the importance of respecting diverse perspectives as a fundamental pillar in cultivating inclusive, reflective, and ethical intellectualism. In the context of multicultural societies and academic spaces filled with diverse schools of thought, openness to differing opinions is a key indicator of intellectual maturity. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach as outlined by Moleong, aiming to understand the subjective meaning behind social phenomena in a holistic manner. The analysis is grounded in recent literature, including academic journals and books published within the last five years. Findings indicate that respecting differing viewpoints functions not only as an ethical norm but also as a crucial mechanism in the development of critical thinking and scientific culture. Multicultural education, intercultural dialogue, and the values of Pancasila play vital roles in internalizing tolerance in both academic and societal contexts. Therefore, respecting diversity of thought is not merely a moral act, but an integral part of a civilized and intellectually engaged process
ETIKA DALAM KOMUNIKASI AKADEMIK: MENGHORMATI RAGAM PANDANGAN SEBAGAI PILAR INTELEKTUALITAS Fadil Banu Pramana; Windiyani, Sri; Riska, Dara; Hasibuan, M. Lappo; Astuti, Rahayu Fuji
Jurnal Citra Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Citra Pendidikan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STKIP Citra Bakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38048/jcp.v5i3.5747

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the importance of respecting diverse perspectives as a fundamental pillar in cultivating inclusive, reflective, and ethical intellectualism. In the context of multicultural societies and academic spaces filled with diverse schools of thought, openness to differing opinions is a key indicator of intellectual maturity. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach as outlined by Moleong, aiming to understand the subjective meaning behind social phenomena in a holistic manner. The analysis is grounded in recent literature, including academic journals and books published within the last five years. Findings indicate that respecting differing viewpoints functions not only as an ethical norm but also as a crucial mechanism in the development of critical thinking and scientific culture. Multicultural education, intercultural dialogue, and the values of Pancasila play vital roles in internalizing tolerance in both academic and societal contexts. Therefore, respecting diversity of thought is not merely a moral act, but an integral part of a civilized and intellectually engaged process Abstract This article explores the importance of respecting diverse perspectives as a fundamental pillar in cultivating inclusive, reflective, and ethical intellectualism. In the context of multicultural societies and academic spaces filled with diverse schools of thought, openness to differing opinions is a key indicator of intellectual maturity. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach as outlined by Moleong, aiming to understand the subjective meaning behind social phenomena in a holistic manner. The analysis is grounded in recent literature, including academic journals and books published within the last five years. Findings indicate that respecting differing viewpoints functions not only as an ethical norm but also as a crucial mechanism in the development of critical thinking and scientific culture. Multicultural education, intercultural dialogue, and the values of Pancasila play vital roles in internalizing tolerance in both academic and societal contexts. Therefore, respecting diversity of thought is not merely a moral act, but an integral part of a civilized and intellectually engaged process
Analysis of students' metacognition in solving pisa questions on space and shape content Windiyani, Sri; Adhany, Reva Salma; Handoko, Hendri
Jurnal Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika (JPPM) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika: Volume 8 Nomor 2 August 2026
Publisher : Pusat Studi Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/jppm.2026.82.99-110

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students' metacognition ability in solving PISA-based math problems on space and shape content consisting of three essay questions. Metacognition was analyzed through three indicators of metacognitive regulation, namely planning, monitoring, and evaluation.  This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with junior high school students selected through purposive techniques which are grouped into three ability categories: high, medium, and low. Data was obtained through analysis of student answers and in-depth interview results. The results of the study show that high-ability students are able to activate all aspects of metacognition optimally, characterized by the ability to formulate completion strategies, monitor thought processes, and evaluate results reflectively. Moderately capable students show mastery of metacognition at a sufficient level, but tend to be inconsistent in monitoring and evaluating the strategies used. Meanwhile, low-skilled students exhibit limited metacognition skills, characterized by minimal planning, weak monitoring, and procedural evaluations without conceptual understanding. These findings confirm that metacognition ability is directly proportional to the quality of mathematical problem solving, particularly in PISA problems that require geometric visualization and spatial reasoning. This study recommends the need for learning that explicitly trains metacognitive strategies to improve students' ability to solve context-based problems.