Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Mardawati; Anwar Budiman; Retno Kus Setyowati
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 5 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i5.2199

Abstract

Perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang saham dalam perseroan terbatas merupakan aspek fundamental dalam menjamin kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan stabilitas ekonomi, terutama ketika direksi melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum yang merugikan kepentingan para pemegang saham. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada pemegang saham terhadap tindakan melawan hukum oleh direksi serta pertimbangan hakim dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan analisis deskriptif terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, dan putusan pengadilan, khususnya Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor 80/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Sel. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang saham dapat dilakukan secara preventif melalui pengaturan hukum dan mekanisme pengawasan internal, serta secara represif melalui pemeriksaan oleh pengadilan, gugatan perdata, maupun pelaporan pidana. Pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara tersebut didasarkan pada asas keadilan, kemanfaatan, dan kepastian hukum yang seimbang.
SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES BETWEEN ELECTRICITY CONSUMER CUSTOMERS AND PLN IN PAYMENT OF ELECTRICITY BILL FINES Kemas Abdul Gaffur; Anwar Budiman; Abdul Chair Ramadhan
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2023
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v4i3.151

Abstract

This study aims to determine the validity of the Decree of the Board of Directors of PLN Number 1486.K/Dir/2011, dated December 27, 2011, concerning the Ordering of Electricity Usage (P2TL), both according to positive law and based on the dogmatics of legal science. Normative legal research focuses on solving legal problems through unique mechanisms, examining the law as a system of rules. This research does not conduct field research and is understood as a science of rules, focusing on dogmatics and legal systems. Existing research data is collected through literature studies, including literature materials in the form of primary materials or sources. The result of the case between Pioneer Chemical and PT PLN (Persero) Distribution of Greater Jakarta and Tangerang Area Cengkareng revolves around the Decree of the Board of Directors of PT PLN (Persero) No. 1486.K/Dir/2011, which states that the calculation of supplementary bills and the proposal for P2TL settlement are based on administrative and/or laboratory examinations. The Panel of Judges decided that the calculation of supplementary bills did not need to be guided by laboratory results, and the Defendant had the authority to conduct P2TL as outlined in the Decree. The decree met the criteria of legitimacy, interpretation, sanction, and jurisdiction in the legal system approach. Pioneer Chemical, as the plaintiff, was unable to submit evidence of unlawful acts committed by PT PLN (Persero) Distribution of Greater Jakarta and Tangerang Area Cengkareng.