Joselevich, María
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Development of Ethnoscience-Based Physics Teaching Materials on the Topic of Motion Dynamics to Enhance Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Rodiah, Siti; Herayanti, Lovy; Sukroyanti, Baiq Azmi; Gummah, Syifa'ul; Habibi, Habibi; Joselevich, María
International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33394/ijete.v2i2.16997

Abstract

This study developed and tested the effectiveness of ethnoscience-based physics teaching materials on the topic of motion dynamics to enhance students’ critical thinking skills. A Research & Development approach using the ADDIE model (Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate) was employed. In the Analyze phase, surveys and interviews identified that over 70% of students struggled to understand the concepts of force and acceleration and that the existing materials lacked local contextual relevance. The Design phase produced a framework that integrated the theory of motion dynamics with the Cidomo phenomenon, experimental worksheets, reflective questions, and a critical thinking assessment rubric. All components were produced and validated by two experts in physics ethnoscience, yielding an average S-CVI score of 86% (rating “Highly Feasible”) and strong internal reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.88). During the Implement phase, 95% of students actively conducted field experiments, 80% posed critical questions, and 70% were able to justify their results based on physics theory. Formative and summative evaluations showed that the average pre-test score increased from 17.75 to 78.75 in the post-test (p < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 5.50). All students achieved a high n-gain category (average g = 0.84). Qualitative data supported the quantitative findings, revealing themes of “Increased Self-Confidence,” “Deep Critical Reflection,” and “Relevance of Local Context.” These results confirm that integrating local cultural context through ethnoscience-based physics teaching materials significantly facilitates the enhancement of students’ critical thinking skills in motion dynamics.
Claim-Evidence-Reasoning-Based Interactive Modules to Improve Students’ Argumentation Skills on Salt Hydrolysis Dewi, Citra Ayu; Muhali, Muhali; Joselevich, María
Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Vol 15, No 3 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/jpp.v15i3.pp1864-1882

Abstract

Claim–Evidence–Reasoning-Based Interactive Modules to Improve Students’ Argumentation Skills on Salt Hydrolysis. Scientific argumentation is a crucial element in chemistry education, enabling students to construct evidence-based explanations and engage in higher-order thinking. Nevertheless, students often struggle with abstract concepts such as salt hydrolysis, a topic that has received limited attention in the context of multimedia-based argumentation research. Objective:  This study aims to develop and validate an interactive multimedia module designed to enhance students’ scientific argumentation skills and conceptual understanding of the salt hydrolysis topic. Methods: A research and development (R&D) approach was employed, following a modified educational development model consisting of seven stages: needs analysis, design, development, expert validation, revision, limited field testing, and final evaluation. The interactive module integrated visual simulations, narrative explanations, and interactive prompts based on the Claim–Evidence–Reasoning (CER) framework. Validation was conducted by three categories of experts, consisting of media experts, subject matter experts, and chemistry teachers, to evaluate the module's pedagogical feasibility, content accuracy, and technical feasibility. Findings: Expert validation indicated high feasibility, with average scores of 92.3% from media experts, 90.6% from subject matter experts, and 88.7% from practitioner teachers. In a pilot study involving 32 students, the average argumentation score increased from 56.8 (pre-test) to 78.2 (post-test), reflecting a gain score of 21.4. Classroom observations noted the increase in student engagement and participation. In addition, student feedback emphasized that the multimedia was user-friendly, visually appealing, and effective in assisting them in understanding complex topics, such as salt hydrolysis. Conclusion: Interactive multimedia modules, when designed using structured reasoning models such as the CER framework, can effectively foster the development of scientific argumentation skills and conceptual understanding. This study contributes to the field of technology-enhanced learning by providing a validated approach for integrating CER into digital science instruction. Future research should investigate the scalability and effectiveness of this approach across different scientific disciplines and educational levels. Keywords: interactive multimedia, salt hydrolysis, argumentation skills, chemistry education, claim–evidence–reasoning.