Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Biomedicine and Clinical Sciences
Dian Eka Putri Harnandhari
Unknown Affiliation
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Comparison of anterior colporrhaphy and vaginal mesh therapy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mukhammad Arif Hadi Khoirudin; Nidia Nursafitri; Mauliya Sri Sukmawati Wahyudi; Muhammad Zainul Fikri; Dita Diana Parti; Wiwien Sugih Utami; Dian Eka Putri Harnandhari
Indonesian Journal of Biomedicine and Clinical Sciences Vol 57 No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/inajbcs.v57i3.19977

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common pelvic disorder among women. Although it is not life-threatening, POP represents significant health concern because it can cause urinary incontinence, decrease sexual function, and impair quality of life. This systematically review was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety of anterior colporrhaphy with vaginal mesh therapy in the management of POP. The data sources were selected for their reputation in publishing high-quality research in urology and women’s health, including PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library, covering publications from 2014 to 2024. We included both randomized and non-randomized studies comparing anterior colporrhaphy with vaginal mesh therapy for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), ensuring a comprehensive review of the available evidence. Data were extracted on sample size, study location, surgical technique, patient satisfaction, reoperation rates, mesh erosion, pain, sexual function, operative time, length of hospital stay, and other complications. A total of 3,528 articles were collected. After removing 2,834 duplicates, 694 unique records remained. Following a quality assessment, six studies met the final inclusion criteria. Analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies revealed no significant differences between the two procedures in terms of erosion rates, SUI incidence, reoperation rates, or patient satisfaction. These findings highlight the importance for urogynecologists to carefully consider patient identification, selection, comorbidities, and the choice of POP repair procedure.
Co-Authors Dita Diana Parti Mauliya Sri Sukmawati Wahyudi Muhammad Zainul Fikri Mukhammad Arif Hadi Khoirudin Nidia Nursafitri Wiwien Sugih Utami