Enjelika Putri Manalu
Fakultas Keperawatan Universitas Pelita Harapan

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Factors influencing training competencies of oncology nurses: A systematic review Brigitta Armelia Mairuhu; Enjelika Putri Manalu; Erica Dorelia Pajuk; Kyela Friska Br Sinurat; Ni Gusti Ayu Eka
Malahayati International Journal of Nursing and Health Science Vol. 8 No. 6 (2025): Volume 8 Number 6
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan-fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Malahayati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33024/minh.v8i6.1364

Abstract

Background: Oncology nursing requires specialized knowledge and skills to provide optimal care for cancer patients. Training and continuous professional development are essential to ensure high-quality patient care. However, various factors may influence nurses' participation and effectiveness in training programs, including institutional support, accessibility to training, individual motivation, and workplace challenges. Understanding these factors is crucial for improving oncology nursing competencies Purpose: To map the factors that influence oncology nurses' training competence in oncology services. Method: A systematic review with article selection guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The systematic review process begins with the formulation of clinical questions relevant to the topic. Before this, the authors establish PICOS criteria, which stand for: P (problem, patient, or population), I (intervention, prognostic factor, or exposure), C (comparison or control), O (outcome), and S (study design). For this article, P: Oncology nurses, I: Training and competency development programs, C: compared with those who did not receive or with a variety of training methods, O: Had an impact on competency improvement, S: Randomized controlled trials. The article search was conducted systematically using the keywords: “Nurses,” AND “Nursing Staff,” AND “Registered Nurses,” AND “Oncology Nursing,” AND “Motivation,” AND “Motivational Factors,” AND “Education,” AND “Training Programs” AND “Oncology Service,” AND “Hospital,” AND “Cancer Care Units”. Results: Effective CPD is contextually relevant, culturally aligned, and uses active learning strategies to develop both technical and non-technical skills, with leadership support and clear career pathways further reinforcing competency growth. Conclusion: Oncology nursing competencies improve most effectively through well-structured, adaptive CPD programs reinforced by committed institutional leadership.
Evaluation of nursing preceptorship programs in hospital settings: A scoping review Eva Suryanti Rajagukguk; Enjelika Putri Manalu; Erica Dorellia Pajuk; Kyela Friska Br Sinurat; Ni Gusti Ayu Eka
Malahayati International Journal of Nursing and Health Science Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Volume 9 Number 1
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan-fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Malahayati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33024/minh.v9i1.1654

Abstract

Background: The quality of nursing services within healthcare institutions is closely linked to the competence of nurses. Competence development is strongly supported by structured and effective mentoring, which facilitates the clinical adaptation of newly graduated nurses. Through preceptorship, novice nurses gain opportunities to integrate into clinical practice, while preceptors serve as role models and supervisors, guiding the professional growth of their mentees. Evaluating the implementation of preceptorship programs is essential to assess both the mentoring process and the experiences of preceptors and preceptees. Such evaluations provide valuable insights for strengthening and advancing preceptorship initiatives in hospital settings. Purpose: To evaluate the implementation of preceptorship programs in hospitals. Method: A scoping review was conducted, involving a comprehensive search of electronic databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE (via EBSCO), and ScienceDirect (Elsevier). The search strategy employed relevant keywords and MeSH terms related to nursing, preceptorship programs, and hospital contexts. Data extraction emphasized outcomes associated with program effectiveness, and the findings were synthesized through descriptive and narrative approaches, integrating both quantitative and qualitative evidence. Results: Preceptorship programs facilitate the adaptation of novice nurses by enhancing clinical skills, confidence, and professional identity, while contributing to nurse retention and improved quality of care. However, challenges such as preceptor workload and limited institutional support remain. Overall, preceptorship demonstrates positive impacts, though issues of sustainability and standardization require further attention. Conclusion: Preceptorship plays a significant role in strengthening nurse competence and improving organizational outcomes. Nevertheless, ensuring sustainability and establishing standardized frameworks are critical for optimizing its long-term effectiveness.