Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis khiyar majlis pada transaksi e-commerce live streaming: Perspektif fikih mazhab Syafi’i-Maliki Ramadhan, Rahmat Gilang
AL-MUQARANAH Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Vol 3 No 2 Agustus 2025
Publisher : Prodi Perbandingan Madzab Fakultas Syari'ah Universitas Islam Zainul Hasan Genggong Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55210/jpmh.v3i2.552

Abstract

The rise of live streaming-based e-commerce has transformed modern trade practices, introducing new challenges in applying Islamic legal principles such as khiyar majlis. This principle allows both seller and buyer to choose whether to proceed with or cancel a transaction while they remain in the same session (majlis). In digital contexts, however, the concept of a majlis becomes unclear, prompting differing interpretations among scholars. This study analyzes the applicability of khiyar majlis in live streaming e-commerce from the perspectives of the Syafi’i and Maliki schools. The Syafi’i view supports the continued validity of khiyar majlis in digital spaces as long as the interaction persists. Conversely, the Maliki school does not recognize khiyar majlis in the absence of direct, physical meetings. Using a descriptive-analytical method, this research examines the relevance of khiyar majlis to consumer protection and fairness in digital transactions. The findings suggest that khiyar majlis can still be implemented in digital commerce, provided the process ensures transparency and protects both parties’ rights.
Patriarchal Structures in Islamic Law and Indonesian Positive Law: A Comparative Legal Analysis from a Gender Justice Perspective Ramadhan, Rahmat Gilang; Hibatullah, Mohammad Rafii'; Farichudzaki, W.K.; Aji, Rajali H.
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v5i2.3126

Abstract

This study critically examines the persistence of patriarchal bias in Indonesia’s legal system by comparing Islamic law and positive law through a gender justice lens. This research specifically identifies how patriarchal structures are embedded in family law norms, judicial reasoning, and institutional legal practices, particularly in matters of marriage, lineage, and gendered legal authority. Using a qualitative normative method with a comparative socio-legal approach, the study analyzes statutory regulations, classical and contemporary Islamic legal doctrines, and scholarly interpretations relevant to the Indonesian legal context. The findings reveal a fundamental divergence between the two systems: while positive law formally endorses gender equality, patriarchal bias persists at the level of legal interpretation and implementation, especially within judicial institutions; conversely, Islamic law, when interpreted textually, may reproduce gender hierarchy, yet offers a strong emancipatory potential when re-read through maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah and egalitarian legal reasoning. The study argues that patriarchal bias is not merely normative but institutional, and that meaningful legal reform requires not only doctrinal revision but also transformation of judicial reasoning and legal culture.