Ikhtiari, Athifa
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Position of The Validity of Digital Signatures in Internet Sales Transactions: Perspectives of the Civil Code and the Consumer Protection Law Wulandari, Andi Sri Rezky; Andika Prawira Buana; Anisah Daeng Tarring; Tri Abriana Ma'ruf; Ikhtiari, Athifa
Indonesia Media Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/imrev.v4i1.21263

Abstract

It is known that in general the process of buying and selling transactions requires a physical meeting between the seller and the buyer, as per Article 1457 of the Civil Code. In the context of modern trade, buying and selling can be done face-to-face, without using original signatures and without territorial boundaries by utilizing information technology. Digital signature emerges as a concept that replaces the word “agree” in electronic transactions. Similar to analog signatures, digital signatures also serve to legitimize existing documents. However, currently there is still much debate regarding the recognition, legal force and legal consequences of electronic signatures, especially when disputes arise between the parties involved. The purpose is to determine and analyze the position of the validity of digital signatures in internet sales transactions: the perspective of the Civil Code and the Consumer Protection Law as well as the position of the parties in the internet Sales and Purchase Agreement. This research uses a normative juridical legal research approach. The approach used is legislation (state approach). In this legal research, analytical descriptive specifications are used. The method used is a literature study (Library Research) and qualitative data analysis using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials which are interpreted in depth. The resume and discussion is that digital signatures are a very appropriate technique used to guarantee the authenticity of documents and avoid the possibility of someone leaking documents. This technique is much more sophisticated and more efficient than manual signatures. Information technology security is then regulated by law by not being an obstacle to technological development, but rather as a counterweight that provides security guarantees to its users. The law is here to provide protection for information technology.
Akuntabilitas Perdata Triadik BPJS, Rumah Sakit, dan Pasien dalam Penyelesaian Pending Klaim Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional Khalid, Hasabuddin; Adha Hamzah, Yuli; Ikhtiari, Athifa
Al-'Adl Vol. 19 No. 02 (2026): Al-'Adl
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The phenomenon of pending claims in the National Health Insurance (JKN) system has been widely studied from administrative and health management perspectives. However, no study has systematically examined the civil law accountability structure within the triadic legal relationship among BPJS Kesehatan, hospitals, and patients—particularly in terms of contractual default (wanprestasi) and civil liability for unlawful acts (perbuatan melawan hukum/PMH). This normative legal study employs a statute approach and a conceptual approach, analysing primary legal materials including the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata), Law No. 40 of 2004 on the National Social Security System, Law No. 44 of 2009 on Hospitals, Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, and Presidential Regulation No. 59 of 2024 on the JKN Program. The study finds that pending claims constitute a contractual vulnerability that may escalate into wanprestasi by BPJS when hospitals have submitted complete documentation yet payment is delayed beyond the 15-working-day statutory limit. Conversely, hospitals may be liable for wanprestasi when administrative non-compliance triggers claim suspension. Moreover, should service quality deteriorate as a consequence of pending claims, hospitals remain independently liable to patients under Article 1365 of KUHPerdata, irrespective of the underlying contractual dispute with BPJS. The novelty of this study lies in constructing a hierarchical triadic civil liability framework and in identifying four critical contractual gaps in the existing JKN cooperation agreement that perpetuate recurring civil disputes. These findings contribute to the reformulation of JKN contractual architecture toward a more equitable, transparent, and patient-protective legal framework.