p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SASI
Suhartono, Mutia Aprilia
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : sasi

Comparative Legal Study on Gender Equality and Female Leadership in Indonesian and Dutch Higher Education Suhartono, Rizki Mustika; Mashendra, Mashendra; Ribeiro, Leonito; Suhartono, Mutia Aprilia; Rachman, Sulyanti
SASI Volume 31 Issue 3, September 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v31i3.3035

Abstract

Introduction: This article explores the ongoing global issue of gender equality and female leadership in higher education. While many countries have adopted gender-inclusive policies, practical implementation remains inconsistent. Western countries such as the Netherlands demonstrate measurable progress, whereas Southeast Asian nations like Indonesia face persistent cultural and structural barriers. Prior studies tend to focus on sociological or institutional aspects, with limited comparative legal analysis.Purposes of the Research: The aim of this study is to explore and compare legal guarantees, national policies, and institutional practices that affect women's access to leadership positions in universities in Indonesia and the Netherlands, to identify legal barriers and propose normative strategies in support of more inclusive academic leadership.Methods of the Research: This research employs normative legal methods with a comparative law approach. It analyzes constitutional provisions, gender equality statutes, higher education regulations, and leadership policies from both countries, supported by literature review and document study.Results of the Research: The findings show that the Netherlands has established stronger legal enforcement for gender equality in academic leadership through comprehensive legal instruments and monitoring mechanisms. In contrast, Indonesia, despite recognizing gender equality in its legal framework, lacks effective implementation mechanisms. The novelty of this research lies in its comparative legal perspective and its recommendation to integrate normative legal approaches with contextual cultural values to promote inclusive governance in higher education.
Legal Governance of Traditional Health Practitioners in Plural Legal Systems: Indonesia and China Suhartono, Mutia Aprilia; Suhartono, Rizki Mustika; Salam, Safrin; Ribeiro, Leonito
SASI Volume 32 Issue 2, June 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v32i2.3706

Abstract

Introduction: This article examines the legal governance of traditional health practitioners within plural legal systems in Indonesia and China. Although traditional health practices function as living law rooted in customary knowledge, state regulation increasingly subjects them to licensing, standardization, and administrative control. This condition raises legal tension between customary norms and formal health law, particularly regarding professional recognition, legal authority, and protection of traditional knowledge within modern healthcare systems. Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare how Indonesia and China regulate traditional health practitioners within plural legal systems, focusing on licensing mechanisms, state recognition, and the position of traditional knowledge as living law under contemporary health governance. Methods of the Research: This research employs normative legal research using a comparative law approach. The study applies statute and conceptual approaches to examine laws, regulations, and policy frameworks governing traditional health practitioners in Indonesia and China. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively to identify governance models and normative gaps. Results of the Research: The findings show that both Indonesia and China formally recognize traditional health practitioners but regulate them through state-centric licensing systems that marginalize customary governance. China integrates traditional practitioners into its national health system, while Indonesia maintains fragmented regulation with limited customary recognition. This study contributes novel insights by positioning traditional health practice as living law and proposing the need for sui generis governance models that reconcile legal pluralism with regulatory certainty.