Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Asset Seizure Regulations Against Public Officials with Unexplained Wealth (A Comparative Study of the Philippines and Australia) Dewi, Dewa Ayu Susanti; Wulandari, Ni Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Tri; Putri, Luh Putu Yeyen Karista
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Volume 7, Nomor 3, Tahun 2025
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v7i3.377-404

Abstract

The Draft Law on Asset Seizure, which includes the concepts of unexplained wealth and non-conviction based (NCB), is a regulation that urgently needs to be passed in Indonesia. This is due to the increasing losses suffered by the state as a result of corruption involving public officials. This legal instrument will strengthen the state's efforts to execute assets derived from corruption without having to wait for a final and binding court decision. Several countries have successfully implemented this concept, including Singapore and the Philippines, in order to accelerate the process of confiscating the assets of corruptors. This study aims to examine the regulations on asset reporting by public officials in uncovering unexplained wealth and to review the regulations on asset confiscation from officials based on unexplained wealth in Indonesia, Australia, and the Philippines. The method used is a normative approach with comparative legal analysis. The results of the study show that Australia, through the Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO), and the Philippines, through Republic Act No. 1379, have regulated the mechanism for seizing assets without waiting for the completion of criminal proceedings. This proves that the NCB approach is effective in combating illegal wealth. The conclusion of this study is that Indonesia needs to immediately pass the Asset Seizure Bill by applying the concepts of unexplained wealth and NCB as in Singapore and the Philippines so that corruption enforcement is more optimal and in line with international practices.
EDUCATION ON UNDERSTANDING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR JAJE UPAKARA MSME PRODUCTS IN SULAHAN VILLAGE Dewi, Dewa Ayu Susanti; Adhiya Garini Putri, Dewa Ayu Putu
Abdi Dosen : Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat Vol. 7 No. 3 (2023): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : LPPM Univ. Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/abdidos.v7i3.1665

Abstract

The existence of MSMEs (Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises) as community businesses in Sulahan Village is quite lot of existence, but knowledge about IPR (Intellectual Property Rights) is still minimal. One of the problems found in Sulahan Village is the knowledge of the MSME owner community regarding the procedures for registering IPR. An alternative that can protect MSMEs from IPR protection is to register MSMEs with the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. By registering the trademark of the MSME, the MSME gets legal protection. IPR registration can be beneficial for MSME actors. This is useful for the protection of a brand, copyrighted work, and product for these MSME business actors. Thus, MSME actors can avoid similarity or plagiarism of other brands, and avoid lawsuits. Through the IPR Education program for MSMEs, it is expected to increase insight and knowledge for MSME owners about the importance of IPR for legal protection. Based on these problems, the author through Community Service activities has carried out IPR Counseling for Jaje Upakara MSMEs in Sulahan Village. The method used is to provide education on understanding IPR, which is carried out through three stages. Namely: the stage of observation, interview, and implementation of work programs in Sulahan Village. The results of the education carried out are in the form of knowledge about IPR Registration to the public and products in the form of PPT.
AUCTION AND DIRECT SALE OF CONFISCATED OBJECTS OR STATE LOOT BY THE DENPASAR DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Juwita Arsawati, Ni Nyoman; Dewi, Dewa Ayu Susanti
Abdi Dosen : Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat Vol. 7 No. 4 (2023): DESEMBER
Publisher : LPPM Univ. Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/abdidos.v7i4.1974

Abstract

A person who commits a crime generally uses an object or goods to make it easier for him to do something he wants, this item is what is commonly referred to as evidence. The Attorney General's Office is an independent institution that has the authority to prosecute and execute Judge decisions. If the judge decides to confiscate the evidence for the state, the Attorney General's Office has several methods or ways of managing the confiscated goods. From this report, the problems can be drawn, namely how the status flow of evidence or confiscated goods to be auctioned and sold directly confiscated by the Denpasar District Prosecutor's Office, what are the legal arrangements regarding auctions and direct sales of confiscated goods confiscated by the Denpasar District Prosecutor's Office, what is the process of auctioning and selling the confiscated goods immediately seized by the Denpasar District Attorney. The author suggests that the Attorney General's Office create a new internal administrative body that takes care of auction administrative activities starting from assessing the physical appearance and price of the loot to selling the loot at auction. The Prosecutor's Office has specific standards in managing confiscation as well as certain processes for evidence that have several legal sources.