Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review (IJRER)
Putri, Muggia Usmi Eka
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Chemistry Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Evaluation of the Implementation of Inclusive Education in Junior High Schools Putri, Muggia Usmi Eka; Ghani, Abd. Rahman A; Al Jufri, Hamid
ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): September
Publisher : Education and Talent Development Center Indonesia (ETDC Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.3884

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate, measure, and prove the gaps in various components—design, installation, process, and product—so that it can provide information for improvement and development related to National Education Standards in building Inclusive Education in Junior High Schools in Tangerang. The evaluation model approach used in this study is the Discrepancy Evaluation Model, or Gap Evaluation Model, developed by Malcolm M. Provus. This research method is a mixed method, not only qualitative descriptive evaluation and quantitative, but also a combination of both. The evaluation subjects were 15 people, including the principal; the vice principal for curriculum, public relations, student affairs, and facilities and infrastructure; teachers; parents; and students. The results indicate that the design aspect, with a discrepancy of 28% in the management standard indicator, falls within the "Medium/Good" category, while the financing indicator, exhibiting a 44% discrepancy, also categorizes as "Medium/Good." Installation Aspect: A gap of 30% in the assessment indicator related to the discrepancy reference is classified as "Medium/Good," whereas a gap of 28% in the assessment facility and infrastructure indicator pertaining to the discrepancy reference is also categorized as "Medium/Good." The process indicator exhibits a 29% discrepancy, categorizing it as “Medium/Good,” while the content indicator shows a 40.4% discrepancy, also classified as “Medium/Good.” The product aspect reveals a 36% gap in the teacher and education personnel competency standard indicator, categorized as “Medium/Good,” while a 25% gap in the graduation competency indicator is also classified as “Medium/Good.”
Co-Authors Ghani, Abd. Rahman A Hamid Al Jufri