Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review (IJRER)
Ghani, Abd. Rahman A
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Chemistry Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Evaluation of the Implementation of Inclusive Education in Junior High Schools Putri, Muggia Usmi Eka; Ghani, Abd. Rahman A; Al Jufri, Hamid
ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): September
Publisher : Education and Talent Development Center Indonesia (ETDC Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.3884

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate, measure, and prove the gaps in various components—design, installation, process, and product—so that it can provide information for improvement and development related to National Education Standards in building Inclusive Education in Junior High Schools in Tangerang. The evaluation model approach used in this study is the Discrepancy Evaluation Model, or Gap Evaluation Model, developed by Malcolm M. Provus. This research method is a mixed method, not only qualitative descriptive evaluation and quantitative, but also a combination of both. The evaluation subjects were 15 people, including the principal; the vice principal for curriculum, public relations, student affairs, and facilities and infrastructure; teachers; parents; and students. The results indicate that the design aspect, with a discrepancy of 28% in the management standard indicator, falls within the "Medium/Good" category, while the financing indicator, exhibiting a 44% discrepancy, also categorizes as "Medium/Good." Installation Aspect: A gap of 30% in the assessment indicator related to the discrepancy reference is classified as "Medium/Good," whereas a gap of 28% in the assessment facility and infrastructure indicator pertaining to the discrepancy reference is also categorized as "Medium/Good." The process indicator exhibits a 29% discrepancy, categorizing it as “Medium/Good,” while the content indicator shows a 40.4% discrepancy, also classified as “Medium/Good.” The product aspect reveals a 36% gap in the teacher and education personnel competency standard indicator, categorized as “Medium/Good,” while a 25% gap in the graduation competency indicator is also classified as “Medium/Good.”
The Implementation of Principal Supervision in Building Teacher Performance in Elementary Schools Lisda, Hafia; Ghani, Abd. Rahman A; Fatayan, Arum
ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): September
Publisher : Education and Talent Development Center Indonesia (ETDC Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.3887

Abstract

This study intends to assess how the principal implements academic supervision to enhance teacher performance in elementary schools. The primary objective of this study is to provide recommendations to schools regarding the implementation of supervision, whether there are aspects that need to be stopped, improved, or continued without changes. Secondary objectives include evaluation of the design, installation, process, and product of the supervision implementation. This study uses an evaluative approach with the Discrepancy Evaluation Model (DEM), which emphasizes identifying gaps between standards (Standard/S) and actual performance (Performance/P) in each implementation stage. Data was collected through interviews, observations, and documentation studies. In this study, the research subjects were the principal, vice principal, 18 teachers, 30 students, and 6 school committee members. The evaluation results show that at the design stage of supervision there are still gaps between standards and performance, especially in the systematic and realistic aspects, so that it is in the "Good" category. The installation stage, implementation process, and supervision product all demonstrate full conformity between standards and performance, resulting in a "Very Good" rating. Overall, the implementation of supervision is in the "Good" category.
Standards for Facilities and Infrastructure in Building Quality Education in Senior High Schools Khairullah, Ridho; Fatayan, Arum; Syarif, Moh Suryadi; Ghani, Abd. Rahman A
ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): September
Publisher : Education and Talent Development Center Indonesia (ETDC Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.3891

Abstract

The intent of this study is to evaluate and measure the gaps in various components—design, installation, process, and product—so that it can provide information for improvement and development related to the Facilities and Infrastructure Standards in Building Educational Quality at Senior High School. The evaluation model approach used in this study is the Discrepancy Evaluation Model, developed by Malcolm Provus. This research method is a mixed method, not only qualitative, descriptive, and evaluative but also quantitative, and it combines both. The evaluation subjects were 12 people, including principals, vice principals, educators, parents, committees, and supervisors at Fatahillah Ciledug Senior High School, Tangerang City. The evaluation findings indicate that the gap or discrepancy in the design aspect is 70% according to the standard indicators of facilities and infrastructure, based on the reference criteria categorized as "High/Sufficiently Appropriate." For the installation aspect, the gap level is 75% on the standard indicators of facilities and infrastructure, which falls into the category of "High/Good." Additionally, there is a gap level of 37% on the same standard indicators, placing it in the category of "Medium/Good." For the process aspect, the gap level of 37% on the standard indicators of facilities and infrastructure with reference to the discrepancy/inequality reference criteria is included in the category of “Medium/Good,” and for the product aspect, the gap or inequality level is 39%. This rating is after consulting the reference criteria of discrepancy/inequality.
Co-Authors Fatayan, Arum Hamid Al Jufri Khairullah, Ridho Lisda, Hafia Putri, Muggia Usmi Eka Syarif, Moh Suryadi