Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE EFFECT OF WORK DISCIPLINE ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION WITH INCENTIVES AS AN INTERVENING VARIABLE (Case Study on Medical doctor and Nurses in Wisconsin City Area) Mohsen Bahmani-OSKooee; Bob Feinberg
MEDALION JOURNAL: Medical Research, Nursing, Health and Midwife Participation Vol. 3 No. 4 (2022): December
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (330.288 KB) | DOI: 10.59733/medalion.v3i4.65

Abstract

In this study, the population was employees of Medical doctor and Nurses in Wisconsin City Area, namely 31 people. Because the target population is less than 100, the sampling technique used is the census method, where the entire population is 31 employees of Medical doctor and Nurses in Wisconsin City Area. it can be concluded that the first hypothesis is accepted, meaning that work discipline (X) has a significant effect on job satisfaction (Y). the second hypothesis is accepted, meaning that incentives (Z) have a significant effect on job satisfaction (Y). the third hypothesis is rejected, meaning that incentives (Z) are not an intervening variable that mediates the effect of work discipline (X) on job satisfaction (Y).
THE INFLUENCE OF WORK DISCIPLINE AND WORK SPIRIT ON MEDICAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN THE WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT OFFICE OF POPULATION CONTROL AND FAMILY PLANNING IN THE CITY OF TEXAS Arnaud Costinot; Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee
MEDALION JOURNAL: Medical Research, Nursing, Health and Midwife Participation Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): June
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59733/medalion.v4i2.71

Abstract

The results of this study show. (1) It can be seen that the adjusted R square value is 0.774 or 77.4%. This shows that the Work Discipline Variable (X1) and Work Morale Variable (X2) can explain the Employee Performance Variable (Y) of 77.4% , the remaining 22.6% (100% - 77.4%) is explained by other variables outside this research model. (2) The results of the (Partial) t test show that tcount (6.481) > ttable (1.990), likewise with a significance value of 0.00 > 0.05, it can be concluded that the first hypothesis is rejected, meaning that the Work Discipline Variable (X1) has an effect not significant to Employee Performance Variable (Y). (3) The results of the t test (Partial) can be seen that the tcount (7.650) > ttable (1.990), and the significance value is 0.00 <0, 05, it can be concluded that the second hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the Morale Variable (X2) has a significant effect on the Employee Performance Variable (Y). (4) The results of the simultaneous test (F) can be seen that the Ftable value is 3.22. From this description it can be seen that Fcount (69.631) > Ftable (3.24), and a significance value of 0.00 <0.05, it can be concluded the third hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the Work Discipline Variable (X1), the Work Morale Variable (X2) have a significant simultaneous effect on the Employee Performance Variable (Y).