Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Legal Review of the Limitation of Citizens' Constitutional Rights During a Global Health Emergency Dwi Saleha; Putri, Vegitya Ramadhani; Lestaluhu, Rajab
Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL AR RO'IS MANDALIKA (ARMADA)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/armada.v5i1.5383

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges to legal systems and the protection of constitutional rights globally. Restrictions on fundamental rights, such as freedom of movement, assembly, and work, imposed by governments to protect public health, have sparked debates on the extent to which constitutional rights can be limited during a global health emergency. This study aims to analyze how different legal systems in various countries address the limitation of constitutional rights during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on the principles of necessity, proportionality, and non-discrimination in the framework of international human rights law. Using a qualitative approach through literature study and library research, this article examines various constitutional legal frameworks, emergency laws, and the application of relevant international human rights principles. The findings show that although many countries have constitutional provisions allowing for the restriction of certain rights during emergencies, the application of the principles of proportionality and necessity varies. The study also highlights the critical role of judicial oversight to ensure that rights limitations are not excessive and are applied fairly, and the importance of aligning national laws with international human rights standards. The implications of this research suggest the need for long-term legal reforms to ensure just and non-discriminatory limitations of rights in future global health emergencies.
TOWARD A NEW PARADIGM OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A COMPARATIVE THEORETICAL STUDY Masoud Lajevardi; Mega Arum; Yanti Susanti; Dwi Saleha; Eko Sudarmanto
International Journal of Accounting, Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJAMESC) Vol. 3 No. 5 (2025): October
Publisher : ZILLZELL MEDIA PRIMA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61990/ijamesc.v3i5.598

Abstract

This paper aims to develop a novel theoretical framework for organizational structures in the era of artificial intelligence (AI). It conducts a comparative analysis of traditional, modern, and postmodern organizational structures to identify limitations in accommodating AI’s autonomous capabilities. Through extensive literature review and critical analysis, the study synthesizes organizational theories with emerging AI research to propose a new paradigm integrating AI as an active participant in organizational dynamics. The findings reveal a significant theoretical gap in existing models, which predominantly treat AI as a tool rather than an autonomous agent. The proposed AI-driven paradigm emphasizes distributed intelligence, adaptive structural fluidity, human-AI symbiosis, and transparent accountability. The conceptual nature of the study calls for empirical validation across different industries and cultures. The paradigm provides a framework for managers and practitioners to redesign organizational architectures, fostering agility and ethical governance in AI-augmented environments. This research fills a critical gap in organizational theory by positioning AI as a core actor influencing structure and decision-making, offering a comprehensive model for organizations navigating the complexity of the digital age.