Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP) Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review (GRLSPR)
Taufik, Ficqhi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
A Comparative Legal Study: Euthanasia for Psychological Reasons Taufik Muhlisani Ihsan, Muhammad Ficqhi; Kamal, Muhammad; Aswari, Aan
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): January - June
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v3i2.341

Abstract

This research conducts a comprehensive examination of euthanasia within the legal frameworks of Indonesia and the Netherlands, aiming to elucidate the criminal liability associated with this act. Employing a normative legal research approach, the study analyzes written legal materials, including regulations, legislation, books, journals, and related legal sources, to facilitate a cross-jurisdictional comparison. The findings reveal distinctive legal perspectives in the two countries. In the Netherlands, euthanasia was initially deemed a criminal offense under penal code sections 293 and 294. However, the landscape evolved with the enactment of the Dutch Law on Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide in 2001. This legislation, effective from April 1, 2002, decriminalized euthanasia under specific conditions. Conversely, in Indonesia, euthanasia, particularly active euthanasia, lacks explicit recognition in positive law. Despite the absence of clear regulations, it is generally treated as a form of murder due to its implication in ending a person's life. Examining criminal liability in Indonesia, the study identifies article 344 of the Criminal Code as the closest provision related to euthanasia. However, detailed regulations are lacking. Additionally, the medical code of ethics plays a role in shaping responsibility. Doctors violating article 7d of the medical code of ethics, which mandates the immediate protection of human life, particularly patients, may face consequences. In conclusion, this research underscores the contrasting legal stances on euthanasia in Indonesia and the Netherlands. While the Netherlands has embraced a legalized and regulated framework, Indonesia's legal landscape remains silent on the matter. The study also highlights the need for clearer legal provisions in Indonesia and emphasizes the role of medical ethics in shaping the responsibility associated with euthanasia.
Menakar Perlindungan Anak Korban KDRT: Perspektif Indonesia dan Norwegia Taufik, Ficqhi
Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/ekspose.v24i1.10253

Abstract

Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan yang berfokus pada studi terhadap bahan hukum tertulis. Tujuan dari penelitian adalah untuk membandingkan perlindungan anak korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) di Indonesia dan Norwegia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan dalam mekanisme perlindungan anak, khususnya pada optimalisasi peran lembaga perlindungan anak. Di Norwegia, lembaga tersebut berperan aktif secara preventif melalui identifikasi dini anak berisiko, memungkinkan intervensi lebih cepat dan efektif. Temuan ini menekankan pentingnya penguatan lembaga serupa di Indonesia untuk mewujudkan sistem perlindungan anak yang lebih responsif dan terpadu.
Perbandingan Tindakan Euthanasia Aktif dan Pasif Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Positif Indonesia Taufik, Ficqhi; Hidjaz, Muh. Kamal; Aswari, Aan
Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP)
Publisher : Program Pascarajana Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine active euthanasia and forms of criminal responsibility. And to know the act of passive euthanasia and its forms of accountability. The results of this research show that Active Euthanasia requires a doctor to take direct action, either by giving a high dose injection, or by removing a medical device that can help or provide care to the patient. The act of Active Euthanasia has not been explicitly regulated in Indonesian legal regulations, but the article that is closest to it, if you look at the elements of the act of active euthanasia, is the article that is closest to Active Euthanasia in Article 344 of the Criminal Code. And in contrast to active euthanasia, cases of passive euthanasia often surface or are often encountered. Passive euthanasia often receives an explanation where the doctor does not provide any more treatment or action to a patient who should receive treatment. Of course, passive euthanasia is also not clearly regulated in Indonesian law, but if you look at the elements of passive euthanasia, the closest thing is Article 304 of the Criminal Code.
Co-Authors Aswari, Aan Hidjaz, Muh. Kamal Muhammad Kamal