Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tafsir Kontekstual Ayat-ayat Riba dalam Era Digital: Relevansi Ulama Tentang Mata Uang Kripto dan Implikasinya bagi Ekonomi Umat Salis Azkia; Salwa Salsabila; Fahmi Abdul Mukhsi; Lina Marlina
SANTRI : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam Vol. 3 No. 5 (2025): Oktober : SANTRI : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ekonomi dan Akuntansi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/santri.v3i5.1855

Abstract

This research analyzes the fundamental conflict between state regulation and Sharia principles regarding cryptocurrency in Indonesia, aiming to explore the views of Islamic scholars and the legal perspective in the Qur'an and its interpretations. Cryptocurrency has become a popular investment trend, especially among the youth. While the Bank Indonesia (BI) prohibits its use as a legal payment instrument, its trading activity is legalized as an investment asset under the supervision of OJK and BI. Conversely, the MUI Fatwa and the majority of scholars declare crypto transactions as forbidden (haram) due to the presence of elements prohibited in Islamic economics: riba (usury) and gharar (uncertainty). Gharar is linked to the extreme price volatility that encourages speculation (maysir) and the non-physical nature of crypto. Riba, on the other hand, is associated with the potential for unfair profit in lending and staking mechanisms. This prohibition is rooted in the interpretation of the Qur'an (QS. Al-Baqarah: 275 and QS. An-Nisa: 29), which strictly forbids riba and consuming others' wealth through bathil (unlawful) means. Consequently, although legally accepted as an investment asset, many scholars view crypto as violating the principles of justice and transparency in Islamic economics.
Mekanisme Penghimpunan dan Penyaluran Dana dalam Bank Syariah dan Konvensional: Tinjauan Fatwa DSN-MUI dan Regulasi Perbankan Asa Zahrani; Salis Azkia; Hali Hali; Muhammad Aryandhi Fikri; Joni Joni; Raihani Fauziah
SANTRI : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam Vol. 3 No. 5 (2025): Oktober : SANTRI : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ekonomi dan Akuntansi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/santri.v3i5.1858

Abstract

This article analyzes the fundamental differences between the mechanisms of fund collection and fund distribution in Islamic banks and conventional banks in Indonesia, based on DSN-MUI Fatwas and banking regulations. In general, both types of banks serve the same function—to collect and distribute funds to support economic activities. However, the main distinction lies in their operational principles. Conventional banks operate using a fixed interest system, establishing a creditor–debtor relationship. In contrast, Islamic banks operate based on Sharia principles that prohibit riba (usury). In fund collection, conventional banks use interest-based savings and deposit products, while Islamic banks apply Wadiah (safekeeping) and Mudharabah (profit-sharing investment) contracts. Regarding fund distribution, conventional banks provide interest-bearing loans, whereas Islamic banks offer financing through Sharia contracts such as Murabahah (cost-plus sale), Musyarakah (partnership), Mudharabah (profit-sharing), and Ijarah (leasing), emphasizing cooperation and risk-sharing. Although Islamic banking is regulated under Law No. 21 of 2008 and DSN-MUI Fatwas, it still faces several challenges, including the dominance of Murabahah financing and the low level of public literacy regarding Islamic financial systems.