Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Aspects of Business Dispute Resolution through Alternative Out-of-Court Settlements Manopo, Jusril D.; G. Baharu, Wiranto
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 7 NO. 3 OCTOBER 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v7i3.32439

Abstract

Legal aspects in business dispute resolution through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) play an essential role as they offer a more efficient, flexible, and lower-cost solution compared to litigation processes in court. Various ADR methods, such as mediation, arbitration, and negotiation, are governed by legal regulations aimed at ensuring fairness for all parties involved. Key legal aspects of ADR in Indonesia include the legal foundations in the Civil Code, Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, and other related regulations. Mediation and arbitration have become preferred choices for business dispute resolution due to their time and cost efficiency, as well as their ability to preserve relationships between the parties involved. However, challenges in its implementation, such as the lack of public awareness, inconsistent application of legal provisions, and limited professional capacity of mediators or arbitrators, continue to hinder the optimal utilization of ADR mechanisms. Furthermore, the enforceability of ADR outcomes particularly arbitral awards often faces procedural barriers and resistance from parties unfamiliar with non-litigation solutions. Despite these obstacles, the development of ADR in Indonesia continues to show promise, supported by judicial encouragement and increasing inclusion in contractual clauses. In conclusion, strengthening the legal framework, enhancing professional standards, and promoting ADR literacy among stakeholders are crucial steps in advancing effective business dispute resolution outside the courtroom.
Implikasi Hukum Yang Ditimbulkan Dari Penyimpangan Prosedur Administratif Dalam Perkara Nomor 1/G/2025/PTUN.GTO Manopo, Jusril D.; Fence M. Wantu; Abdul Hamid Tome
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 5 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i5.2277

Abstract

Isu utama dalam perkara ini ialah pengajuan gugatan tanpa menempuh banding administratif sebagaimana diwajibkan Pasal 75 UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 dan Pasal 48 UU No. 5 Tahun 1986, yang mencerminkan inkonsistensi hukum serta menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum, inefisiensi peradilan, dan pelanggaran prinsip good governance. Penelitian ini membahas implikasi hukum dari penyimpangan prosedur administratif dalam perkara Nomor 1/G/2025/PTUN.GTO di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) Gorontalo. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus untuk menganalisis keterkaitan antara norma hukum tertulis dan putusan pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menegaskan bahwa penyimpangan prosedur administratif dapat menimbulkan preseden keliru yang mendorong masyarakat mengabaikan mekanisme administratif dan langsung menempuh jalur litigasi, sehingga berpotensi memperberat beban peradilan. Lebih lanjut, fenomena ini mengurangi akuntabilitas birokrasi karena mekanisme koreksi internal pemerintah menjadi tidak optimal. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan konsistensi hakim dalam menegakkan syarat administratif, penguatan regulasi teknis, serta peningkatan pemahaman hukum bagi masyarakat dan aparatur pemerintah.