Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUSTISI Jurnal hukum IUS PUBLICUM
Nahdliyin, Sukma Hidayatun
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERAN LITERASI DIGITAL BAGI MASYARAKAT DALAM MENGURANGI DAMPAK KEJAHATAN TRANSASKI ELEKTRONIK ILLEGAL Romadhonia, Annisa; Nahdliyin, Sukma Hidayatun; Janah, Miftakhul
Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum Vol 5 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Doktor Husni Ingratubun Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55551/jip.v5i1.96

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi sebab akibat majunya perkembangan teknologi terutama akibat arus globalisasi. Salah satu bidang yang terkena imbas dari majunya teknologi adalah bidang keuangan. Saat ini industri Financial Technology (Fintech) mengeluarkan produk peer to peer lending (P2P) berupa pinjaman online. Namun, permasalahan yang kemudian muncul ialah adanya pinjaman online illegal yang secara jelas tidak terdaftar dalam Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Fenomena seperti itu merupakan bentuk pelanggaran hukum dimana keadaan saat ini semakin marak dan banyak memakan korban. Oleh sebab itu pentingnya menjadi individu yang melek akan digital dimulai dengan faham akan literasi digital. Pentingnya literasi digital bagi masyarakat, terutama bagi golongan masyarakat yang susah mengikuti isu kemajuan teknologi. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum yurudis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, aturan hukum dan permasalahan isu pelanggaran hukum.
Review of the Doctrine of Dilution Based on the Perspective of Corrective Justice for Trademark Owners Nahdliyin, Sukma Hidayatun; Latifah, Emmy
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): JUSTISI Inpress
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i1.4774

Abstract

The study aims to analyze whether the doctrine of trademark dilution has provided corrective justice or otherwise, so that the balance of rights for trademark owners can be fulfilled.The methods used in this study are normative or doctrinal legal research methods. The research approaches used are legislative, conceptual, case-based, and comparative approaches.The novelty of this research lies in the perspective of corrective justice in analyzing court decisions related to dilution actions. This research is expected to contribute to further research and policy recommendations for the government and judges to produce regulations and decisions that are fair to trademark owners.The results of the comparative law study show that anti-dilution regulations in the United States are comprehensively regulated, but there are shortcomings in the courts. Court decisions regarding well-known trademarks are considered detrimental and do not restore the rights that have been violated. In fact, the main purpose of dilution is to provide legal protection for well-known trademarks. Indonesia itself has not yet fully regulated anti-dilution regulations.The concluded findings of this comparative legal study serve as a lesson for Indonesia so that future regulations can take into account the balance of rights between well-known trademarks and other trademarks in order to avoid market monopoly.
Co-Authors Emmy Latifah Miftakhul Janah Romadhonia, Annisa