Anastasya, Dewa Ayu Julia
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Formulasi Kewenangan Notaris dalam Menerima Titipan Uang dalam Transaksi Berkaitan dengan Akta yang Dibuatnya Anastasya, Dewa Ayu Julia; Bagiastra, I Nyoman
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i01.p15

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to gain insight and knowledge related to why the notary's authority is needed to receive money deposits in transactions between parties related to deeds made and to find out about the formulation of the notary's authority to receive money deposits in transactions between parties related to deeds made in the future. The type of research used in this study is a normative legal research. The urgency of the need for the notary's authority to receive money deposits in transactions between parties related to deeds made, if an official takes action outside his authority, it is called an unlawful act. The formulation of the notary's authority to receive money deposits in transactions between parties related to deeds made in the future by prioritizing the prudential principle or the principle of caution which is a principle that requires a notary to pay attention to and consider all possible impacts or risks that may occur due to his actions in carrying out his duties as a notary. Tujuan penelitian ini ialah guna mendapatkan wawasan dan pengetahuan terkait mengapa diperlukannya kewenangan notaris dalam menerima titipan uang dalam transaksi para pihak berkenaan dengan akta yang dibuatnya serta untuk mengetahui mengenai formulasi kewenangan notaris dalam menerima titipan uang dalam transaksi para pihak berkaitan dengan akta yang dibuatnya di masa yang akan datang. Jenis penelitian yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Urgensi diperlukannya kewenangan notaris dalam menerima titipan uang dalam transaksi para pihak berkaitan dengan akta yang dibuatnya, apabila seorang pejabat melakukan tindakan diluar wewenangnya, maka disebut sebagai perbuatan melanggar hukum. Formulasi kewenangan notaris dalam menerima titipan uang dalam transaksi para pihak berkaitan dengan akta yang dibuatnya di masa yang akan datang dengan mengedepankan prudential principle atau prinsip kehati-hatian yang merupakan prinsip yang mengharuskan seorang notaris untuk memperhatikan dan menimbang segala kemungkinan dampak atau risiko yang mungkin terjadi atas tindakannya dalam menjalankan tugasnya sebagai notaris.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP WARGA NEGARA ASING YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA ASUSILA DI DESTINASI WISATA Anastasya, Dewa Ayu Julia; Widiati, Ida Ayu Putu; Widyantara, I Made Minggu
Jurnal Analogi Hukum 287-292
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/jah.6.3.2024.287-292

Abstract

Immoral acts by foreigners in tourist destinations must receive sanctions based on regulations in the Criminal Code and sanctions based on customary law. The problem is, 1) what are the legal regulations for foreigners who commit immoral acts in tourist destinations? and 2) How the judge considered decision Number 66/Pid.B/2021/PN. Sgr about immoral crimes committed by foreigners in tourist destinations? This research describes the legal regulations and considerations of judges in deciding cases of acts of decency by foreign citizens in tourist destinations. This research uses deductive legal logic which is analyzed descriptively through a statute approach, conceptual approach and case approach. This research shows that the legal regulations for foreigners who carry out decency acts in tourist destinations are part of the regulations for decency acts in the Criminal Code and customary law. The judge's decision considerations are based on legal and non-legal factors. The relationship between the two lies in the application of criminal sanctions and the judge's consideration in making a decision.