Annisa Ardianti Br Tarigan
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Technology Assisted Therapy Innovation for War Trauma: An Intervention Synthesis Nurzahara Sihombing; M. Agung Rahmadi; Laila Zahra; Putri Ramadhani; Ferius Lahagu; Helsa Nasution; Luthfiah Mawar; Siti Padila; Annisa Ardianti Br Tarigan
Detector: Jurnal Inovasi Riset Ilmu Kesehatan Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Inovasi Riset Ilmu Kesehatan
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/detector.v3i4.5859

Abstract

This meta-synthesis examines in depth the effectiveness of technology-assisted therapy (TAT) in the treatment of war-related trauma through a systematic analysis of 47 empirical studies with a total of 6,842 participants published between 2010 and 2024. The quantitative synthesis indicates that the implementation of TAT demonstrates statistically significant effectiveness in reducing the severity of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms (d=0.78, 95% CI [0.65, 0.91]), anxiety (d=0.69, 95% CI [0.54, 0.84]), and depression (d=0.72, 95% CI [0.58, 0.86]) among populations affected by armed conflict. Among the various digital modalities, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) exhibits the strongest therapeutic effect (d=0.85) compared with mobile-based intervention (d=0.71) and teletherapy (d=0.68). Further moderator analysis identifies the optimal intervention duration as 12 to 16 weeks, with a significant effect contribution (β=0.34, p<.001) and a relatively moderate dropout rate of 18.7%. These findings extend Tng et al. (2024) by confirming the superiority of VRET and by confirming the significance of therapist support for the effectiveness of TAT (Wu et al., 2025). In contrast to the meta-analysis by Eshuis et al. (2021), which emphasized a single approach, this study reveals that hybrid interventions that integrate multiple digital platforms simultaneously (d=0.89) are superior to single-platform interventions (d=0.67). Overall, the results of this meta-synthesis provide a strong empirical foundation for the development of more comprehensive, adaptive, and contextually relevant TAT protocols for war-related trauma.
The Effectiveness of Mental Health Programs for Syrian Refugees in Turkey: A Regional Meta-Review of Interventions M. Agung Rahmadi; Luthfiah Mawar; Zilva Husayri Zulvan; Nafiza Rizky Ramadhani Lubis; Maulidyah Azzahra; Helsa Nasution; Nurzahara Sihombing; Muhammad Wahyudi Berutu; Annisa Ardianti Br Tarigan
Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan dan Gizi Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Januari: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan dan Gizi
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jig.v4i1.8402

Abstract

This meta-review evaluates the effectiveness of diverse mental health programs targeting Syrian refugees in Turkey over the period 2015-2023 through a systematic synthesis of 47 studies involving a total of 12,847 participants. Meta-regression results demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder symptoms, with a large effect size (d = -0.86, 95% CI [-1.02, -0.70], p < .001), as well as a significant reduction in depressive symptoms (d = -0.72, 95% CI [-0.88, -0.56], p < .001) following intervention. Among the therapeutic approaches examined, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy exhibited the strongest therapeutic effect (β = 0.45, p < .001), followed by Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (β = 0.38, p < .001). Further moderator analysis revealed that group-based interventions were more effective than individual approaches (OR = 1.86, 95% CI [1.42, 2.30]). At the same time, program duration of 12-16 weeks showed a strong correlation with optimal clinical outcomes (r = 0.67, p < .001). These findings extend the results of Acarturk et al. (2022) regarding the effectiveness of CBT and reinforce the argument advanced by Shehadeh et al. (2016) concerning the superiority of group-based approaches, while also indicating a longer optimal intervention duration than previously reported. In contrast to the meta-analysis by Antuña-Camblor & Hernández (2025), which emphasized EMDR, this study identifies CBT as superior to EMDR among Syrian refugees in Turkey. The novelty of this study lies in its comprehensive analysis of program moderator factors and the identification of the most effective intervention duration parameters for the target population.