Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bina Hukum Lingkungan JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Bina Hukum Lingkungan
Drajat, Muhammad Rifqi Rafi
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kesepahaman Makna Kawasan Hutan dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum bagi Perizinan Usaha Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di Indonesia Drajat, Muhammad Rifqi Rafi; Syukur, Amalia Nurfitria; Panjaitan, Mutiara
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 10, Nomor 1, Oktober 2025
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24970/bhl.v10i1.400

Abstract

ABSTRAK Kelapa sawit sebagai salah satu komoditas unggulan pada sektor perkebunan masih memiliki permasalahan dalam proses perizinan berusaha, salah satunya permasalahan kepastian lahan bagi pelaku usaha. Terdapat 192 korporasi (perusahaan sawit) yang memiliki HGU namun lahan perkebunan kelapa sawitnya masuk ke dalam kawasan hutan. Luas lahan yang mencapai 3.126.439 (tiga juta seratus dua puluh enam ribu empat ratus tiga puluh sembilan) dilakukan oleh KLHK berdasarkan Keputusan Nomor SK.01/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/1/2022 Tentang Pencabutan Izin Konsesi Kawasan Hutan yang dilakukan secara sepihak pencabutannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan black-letter atau doktrinal yang dilakukan melalui analisis argumentasi yang dibangun dari seperangkat norma hukum dan doktrin dengan perumusan kesimpulan berupa adanya pertentangan antar norma (konflik antar norma/kaidah). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kesepahaman makna kawasan hutan menjadi penting dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan perbedaan persepsi dari masing-masing Kementerian (sektoral) sebagai pemangku kebijakan perizinan usaha kelapa sawit.  Terlebih, 192 korporasi yang sudah memiliki status hak atas tanah (HGU), seharusnya tidak dapat dibatalkan izin konsesinya pelepasan kawasan hutannya oleh KLHK, karena korporasi telah melewati serangkaian proses perizinan yang inkrah dengan tahap akhir perolehan HGU yang menjadi domain kepengurusan ATR/BPN apabila terjadi suatu pelanggaran. Pengukuhan kawasan hutan yang dilakukan oleh KLHK seharusnya dapat melihat kepada prosedur Peraturan-Perundang-Undangan dan Putusan MK No. 45/PUU-IX/2011 dan Putusan MK No. 34/PUU-IX/2011 dengan 4 tahap rangkaian untuk mengukuhkan kawasan hutan agar menciptakan kepastian hukum bagi pelaku usaha kelapa sawit di Indonesia. Kata kunci: kepastian hukum; kesepahaman makna kawasan hutan; perkebunan kelapa sawit; pengukuhan kawasan hutan; perizinan.    ABSTRACT Palm Oil as one of the leading commodities in the plantation sector still has problems in the business licensing process, one of which is the problem of land certainty for business actors. There are 192 corporations (palm oil companies) that have HGU but their oil palm plantation land is included in the forest area. The land area of 3,126,439 (three million one hundred twenty-six thousand four hundred thirty-nine) was carried out by KLHK based on Decree Number SK.01/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/1/2022 concerning Revocation of Forest Area Concession Permits which was carried out unilaterally. This research uses black-letter or doctrinal analysis through argumentation built from a set of legal norms and doctrines with the formulation of conclusions in the form of conflicts between norms. The results showed that an understanding of the meaning of forest areas is important in resolving the problem of differences in perceptions from each Ministry (sectoral) as a policy holder of oil palm business licensing.  Moreover, 192 corporations that already have land rights status (HGU), should not be able to cancel their concession permits for the release of forest areas by KLHK, because the corporation has gone through a series of incomplete licensing processes with the final stage of obtaining HGU which is the domain of the ATR / BPN management if a violation occurs. The confirmation of forest areas carried out by the MoEF should be able to look at the procedures of the Regulations and Constitutional Court Decision No. 45 / PUU-IX / 2011 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 34 / PUU-IX / 2011 with a series of 4 stages to confirm forest areas in order to create legal certainty for palm oil business actors in Indonesia. Keywords: licensing; oil palm plantation; forest area gazettement; forest area understanding; legal certainty.
Kesepahaman Makna Kawasan Hutan dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum bagi Perizinan Usaha Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di Indonesia Drajat, Muhammad Rifqi Rafi; Syukur, Amalia Nurfitria; Panjaitan, Mutiara
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 10, Nomor 1, Oktober 2025
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24970/bhl.v10i1.400

Abstract

ABSTRAK Kelapa sawit sebagai salah satu komoditas unggulan pada sektor perkebunan masih memiliki permasalahan dalam proses perizinan berusaha, salah satunya permasalahan kepastian lahan bagi pelaku usaha. Terdapat 192 korporasi (perusahaan sawit) yang memiliki HGU namun lahan perkebunan kelapa sawitnya masuk ke dalam kawasan hutan. Luas lahan yang mencapai 3.126.439 (tiga juta seratus dua puluh enam ribu empat ratus tiga puluh sembilan) dilakukan oleh KLHK berdasarkan Keputusan Nomor SK.01/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/1/2022 Tentang Pencabutan Izin Konsesi Kawasan Hutan yang dilakukan secara sepihak pencabutannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan black-letter atau doktrinal yang dilakukan melalui analisis argumentasi yang dibangun dari seperangkat norma hukum dan doktrin dengan perumusan kesimpulan berupa adanya pertentangan antar norma (konflik antar norma/kaidah). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kesepahaman makna kawasan hutan menjadi penting dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan perbedaan persepsi dari masing-masing Kementerian (sektoral) sebagai pemangku kebijakan perizinan usaha kelapa sawit.  Terlebih, 192 korporasi yang sudah memiliki status hak atas tanah (HGU), seharusnya tidak dapat dibatalkan izin konsesinya pelepasan kawasan hutannya oleh KLHK, karena korporasi telah melewati serangkaian proses perizinan yang inkrah dengan tahap akhir perolehan HGU yang menjadi domain kepengurusan ATR/BPN apabila terjadi suatu pelanggaran. Pengukuhan kawasan hutan yang dilakukan oleh KLHK seharusnya dapat melihat kepada prosedur Peraturan-Perundang-Undangan dan Putusan MK No. 45/PUU-IX/2011 dan Putusan MK No. 34/PUU-IX/2011 dengan 4 tahap rangkaian untuk mengukuhkan kawasan hutan agar menciptakan kepastian hukum bagi pelaku usaha kelapa sawit di Indonesia. Kata kunci: kepastian hukum; kesepahaman makna kawasan hutan; perkebunan kelapa sawit; pengukuhan kawasan hutan; perizinan.    ABSTRACT Palm Oil as one of the leading commodities in the plantation sector still has problems in the business licensing process, one of which is the problem of land certainty for business actors. There are 192 corporations (palm oil companies) that have HGU but their oil palm plantation land is included in the forest area. The land area of 3,126,439 (three million one hundred twenty-six thousand four hundred thirty-nine) was carried out by KLHK based on Decree Number SK.01/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/1/2022 concerning Revocation of Forest Area Concession Permits which was carried out unilaterally. This research uses black-letter or doctrinal analysis through argumentation built from a set of legal norms and doctrines with the formulation of conclusions in the form of conflicts between norms. The results showed that an understanding of the meaning of forest areas is important in resolving the problem of differences in perceptions from each Ministry (sectoral) as a policy holder of oil palm business licensing.  Moreover, 192 corporations that already have land rights status (HGU), should not be able to cancel their concession permits for the release of forest areas by KLHK, because the corporation has gone through a series of incomplete licensing processes with the final stage of obtaining HGU which is the domain of the ATR / BPN management if a violation occurs. The confirmation of forest areas carried out by the MoEF should be able to look at the procedures of the Regulations and Constitutional Court Decision No. 45 / PUU-IX / 2011 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 34 / PUU-IX / 2011 with a series of 4 stages to confirm forest areas in order to create legal certainty for palm oil business actors in Indonesia. Keywords: licensing; oil palm plantation; forest area gazettement; forest area understanding; legal certainty.
The Position of Customary Marriage in Australia and Indonesia: A Comparative Study of Aboriginal and Sunda Wiwitan Marriage Registration Drajat, Muhammad Rifqi Rafi; Suparto, Susilowati
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i4.7885

Abstract

Australia and Indonesia have recognized the existence of indigenous peoples in their constitutions. However, in the implementation of marriage registration, there are still several obstacles that prevent registration. The research method used is empirical juridical, obtained directly through a study of the norms and principles contained in primary, secondary, and tertiary legal data. The results of the study indicate that the customary marriages of the Aboriginal indigenous community are still not fully recognized in Australia due to Australian marriage regulations that only recognize one marriage law, namely the Marriage Act 1961, with marriage ceremonies conducted formally before a marriage celebrant. Customary marriage practices conducted by the Aboriginal community cannot be registered by the state, while marriage registration for the Sunda Wiwitan indigenous community in Indonesia can be registered provided that the indigenous community has joined an organization registered under the Ministry. The legal consequences of marriages within the Sunda Wiwitan and Aboriginal communities will impact several aspects, including uncertainty regarding the legal status of children born from such marriages, difficulties in registering other administrative documents, and challenges in accessing public facilities provided by the government, particularly in the area of healthcare due to ongoing requirements.Keywords: Indigenous Peoples; Marriage Registration; Aboriginals; Sunda Wiwitan; Legal Recognition
Co-Authors Mutiara Panjaitan Suparto, Susilowati Syukur, Amalia Nurfitria