Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM SASI Journal of Law and Legal Reform
Soplantila, Valentino Dinatra
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Hybrid Model of Personal Data Protection for Consumers in Digital MSMEs: A Comparative Study of Indonesian and China Regulations Hetharie, Yosia; Ikhwansyah, Isis; Rahmawati, Ema; Soplantila, Valentino Dinatra
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): October, 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i4.22388

Abstract

The protection of consumers’ personal data in digital MSME (Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises) businesses poses a significant challenge in the era of digital transformation, particularly amid the rising cases of data breaches in Indonesia. Although Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection (PDP Law) has come into effect, its implementation still faces numerous obstacles, especially for MSMEs that are limited in terms of resources and technological understanding. By comparison, China, through its Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), enforces strict supervision combined with AI-driven compliance technologies. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of personal data protection frameworks in Indonesia and China and to propose a hybrid model that integrates government regulations with technological solutions. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative law approaches, relying on secondary data such as regulations, academic journals, and policy documents. The findings indicate that adopting a hybrid model for the protection of consumers’ personal data in digital MSME businesses could serve as an effective solution. This model merges a compliance-based approach, as adopted under Indonesia’s PDP Law, with the strict oversight mechanisms implemented under China’s PIPL. By adapting mechanisms such as mandatory registration, periodic audits, and technology-based compliance incentives, Indonesia could enhance transparency, accountability, and data security within its digital MSME ecosystem.
Restorative Justice Arrangements in Civil Law, Common Law, and Indonesian Legal Systems Apituley, Lilian Gressthy Florencya; Baroto, Wishnu Agung; Soplantila, Valentino Dinatra
SASI Volume 31 Issue 4, December 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v31i4.3270

Abstract

Introduction: This article will outline how the application of restorative justice in the civil law system, the common law system, and the Indonesian legal system compares.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of the regulation and implementation of restorative justice across three legal systems - civil law, common law, and Indonesia’s hybrid legal system - and to identify best practices and challenges that can inform the development of restorative justice in diverse legal contexts.Methods of the Research: The study uses a normative legal method, combining a legal concept approach to examine the philosophical and ethical foundations of restorative justice with a statutory approach to analyze formal legal mechanisms. This methodology links legal theory with practice while highlighting the integration of normative principles within Indonesia’s socio-cultural context, including Pancasila and customary law.Results of the Research: This study compares restorative justice implementation in civil law, common law, and Indonesia’s legal system. Civil law is rigid and procedural, while common law allows flexible mechanisms such as victim–offender mediation. In Indonesia, despite Supreme Court Rule Number 1 of 2024, challenges include limited understanding among law enforcement, inconsistent application, and insufficient institutional support. Strengthening implementation requires harmonized regulations, professional training, community-based mechanisms rooted in local wisdom and customary law, and public awareness. Indonesia’s model highlights a transformative approach that integrates restorative principles with national values of humanity, justice, and social harmony.
Reconstructing The Role of Confiscation and Seizure in Realizing The Right to Restitution for Victims of Criminal Acts Ubwarin, Erwin; Nelson, Febby Mutiara; Jatna, R Narendra; Soplantila, Valentino Dinatra
LAW REFORM Vol 22, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v22i1.73378

Abstract

The National Criminal Code (KUHP) and Law No.20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) have strengthened the recognition of victims’ rights, particularly with regard to restitution as an additional punishment. In practice, however, restitution has not been implemented optimally, resulting in many victims failing to obtain adequate compensation. The aims of this study are: 1) to identify and analyse the role of conventional seizure as evidence, and 2) to analyse and formulate the role of modern seizure as an instrument for restoring victims’ rights. Employing a doctrinal approach, this research produces descriptive legal analysis and prescriptive recommendations by formulating an expanded concept of seizure. The findings indicate that both the KUHP and the KUHAP regulate restitution as a victim’s right to material and immaterial compensation and recognise seizure as a legal instrument. However, there is no explicit regulation linking seizure directly to the fulfilment of restitution. Consequently, restitution remains difficult to enforce when perpetrators lack assets or refuse to comply. The study concludes that the concept of seizure must be expanded to include the broader seizure of perpetrators’ assets and the possibility of state-funded compensation to ensure that victims’ restitution rights are realised effectively, fairly and enforceably.
Co-Authors Agustus Sani Nugroho & Ema Rahmawati Heryaman, Agustus Sani Nugroho & Apituley, Lilian Gressthy Florencya Baroto, Wishnu Agung Hetharie, Yosia Isis Ikhwansyah Jatna, R Narendra Nelson, Febby Mutiara Ubwarin, Erwin