Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review
Moertiono, Juli
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Qanun Sebagai Sumber Hukum Pidana Islam di Aceh Permadi S, Muhammad Dimas; Moertiono, Juli; Minin, Agusta Ridha
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Vol 4 No 7 (2025): October
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v4i7.617

Abstract

Aceh merupakan satu-satunya provinsi yang memiliki hukum syariah dan mengesahkan serta menerapkannya sesuai amanat dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 44 Tahun 1999 tentang Penyelenggaraan Keistimewaan Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Aceh. Qanun Provinsi Aceh No. 11 Tahun 2002 tentang pelaksanaan syari’at Islam di bidang Aqidah, Ibadah, dan Syi’ar Islam dan Qanun Aceh No 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat, yang berisi tentang khamar, maisir, khalwat, ikhtilath, zina, pelecehan seksual, pemerkosaan, qodzaf, liwath dan mushahaqah. Hal ini dikuatkan dengan Undang-Undang tentang Pemerintahan Aceh No. 11 Tahun 2006 (selanjutnya disebut UU Pemerintahan Aceh) menjelaskan hal ini, terutama dalam Pasal 128 ayat (2). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kuantitatif dengan mempergunakan pendekatan normatif (legal research) untuk mendapatkan data skunder dan pendekatan sosiologis (yuridis sosiologis), untuk memperoleh data primer melalui penelitian lapangan (field research). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pertama, Mekanisme penerapan qanun aceh sebagai sumber hukum pidana islam yaitu Sistem peradilan pidana Islam yang dijalankan di Aceh memperlihatkan perpaduan antara sistem peradilan pidana konvensional dengan sistem peradilan syari’ah. Perpaduan ini terlihat dari unsur-unsur pendukung berupa adanya kepolisian, kejaksaan,dan pengadilan dalam hal ini mahkamah syari’ah. Mekanisme kerja sistem peradilan yang berlaku bersifat konvensional. Kedua, Terkait kendala dan hambatan yang dihadapi oleh Wilayatul Hisbah dalam menangani kasus khalwat di Kabupaten/Kota. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa implementasi Qanun Aceh No. 6 Tahun 2014, khususnya dalam aspek pencegahan dan penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran khalwat, masih memerlukan upaya perbaikan. Dengan memperbaiki faktor-faktor internal, eksternal, dan kelembagaan, diharapkan implementasi Qanun Aceh No. 6 Tahun 2014 dapat berjalan lebih baik, sehingga tujuan penerapan syariat Islam di Aceh dapat tercapai secara efektif dan berkelanjutan.
Juli Legality And Accountability Of The Process Of Destruction Of Evidence Of Illegal Fishing With The Involvement Of A Notary: Legality And Accountability Of The Process Of Destruction Of Evidence Of Illegal Fishing With The Involvement Of A Notary Moertiono, Juli
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6448

Abstract

The destruction of evidence in illegal fishing cases is an important step in law enforcement to ensure that evidence is not misused and in accordance with the provisions of the law. This article discusses the legality and accountability of the process of destroying illegal fishing evidence by highlighting the role of notaries as authorized public officials. This study uses a juridical-normative approach with literature analysis of relevant regulations. The results of the study show that the involvement of notaries contributes significantly to supporting legal transparency and accountability. More specific regulations are needed to increase synergy between notaries and law enforcement agencies in the process of destroying evidence. The destruction of evidence in illegal fishing cases is a very important step in law enforcement to prevent the misuse of evidence and ensure that the legal process runs in accordance with the provisions of the law. Evidence of illegal fishing, such as illegally caught fish, prohibited fishing gear, or boats, often has high economic value and has the potential to cause greater losses if not managed properly. Therefore, the process of destroying evidence not only requires strict supervision, but must also be carried out with valid documentation to provide legal certainty. However, the results of the study also show a number of challenges in practice, including the lack of specific regulations that regulate the involvement of notaries in detail in illegal fishing cases. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations to increase synergy between notaries and law enforcement agencies, such as the police and prosecutor's office, to ensure that the process of destroying evidence is carried out legally, transparently, and accountably.
Co-Authors Minin, Agusta Ridha Permadi S, Muhammad Dimas