Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nusantara Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Satriya Aldi Putrazta
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Lintas Negara Berkedok Lowongan Kerja Digital di Myanmar Satriya Aldi Putrazta
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): November : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v2i4.1204

Abstract

This study discusses legal protection for victims of human trafficking disguised as job vacancies in Myanmar, which has affected hundreds of Indonesian citizens. This phenomenon shows a new mode of digital-based human trafficking through social media, offering fictitious high-paying jobs that ultimately lead to forced labor in the online scamming sector. This study uses a normative legal research method with a legislative and conceptual approach, which examines Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of Human Trafficking, Law Number 18 of 2017 concerning the Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers, the 2000 Palermo Protocol, and a number of International Labor Organization (ILO) conventions related to forced labor and labor migration. The results of the study show that this case fulfills the elements of human trafficking as stipulated in Article 2 paragraph (1) of the TPPO Law, because there are elements of recruitment, fraud, confinement, and forced labor exploitation. From an international law perspective, these actions violate the provisions of the Palermo Protocol and the ILO convention on the elimination of forced labor. The Indonesian government has a legal and moral responsibility to provide protection and recovery for victims of TPPO, as well as to ensure the principle of non-criminalization. However, the implementation of protection is still hampered by weak supervision of digital recruitment, jurisdictional limitations, and suboptimal cross-border cooperation. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the digital-based migrant protection system, enhance bilateral and multilateral cooperation, and apply the principle of state due diligence in the prevention and enforcement of laws against cross-border TPPO.  
Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Studi Perbandingan Sistem Pidana Amerika Serikat, Malaysia, dan Singapura Satriya Aldi Putrazta
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 2 No. 11 (2025): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Edisi November 2025)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v2i11.1201

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and compare the legal systems and enforcement models for combating corruption in three countries namely the United States, Malaysia, and Singapore while identifying key lessons that can be applied to strengthen Indonesia’s anti-corruption legal framework. Although all three countries demonstrate strong commitments to eradicating corruption, each employ distinct normative and institutional approaches. The United States relies on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which emphasizes corporate liability, global jurisdiction, and is enforced by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), supported by a robust whistleblower protection system. Malaysia, through the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009, adopts a criminal law approach with a broad definition of gratification and reverse burden of proof under Section 50. Singapore, through its Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) and the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), demonstrates highly effective enforcement despite having relatively concise regulations, owing to institutional integrity, political commitment, and administrative consistency. This research employs a normative juridical method, incorporating statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal sources include primary legal materials (statutes and regulations), secondary legal materials (literature and legal journals), and tertiary sources (legal dictionaries and encyclopedias). The analysis reveals that the success of anti-corruption systems does not solely depend on the severity of legal sanctions but on the consistency of enforcement, institutional independence, and political will. Therefore, Indonesia must undertake comprehensive legal reforms, including normative improvements, institutional strengthening, and broader public participation, to establish a sustainable, effective, and just anti-corruption legal system.
Reformulasi Regulasi Perkawinan Paksa: Studi Komparasi Antara Indonesia, Inggris Raya, dan Pakistan Satriya Aldi Putrazta; Sonia Wijaya Putra; Dominikus Rato; Triana Ohoiwutun
Nusantara Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): NJMS - November 2025
Publisher : PT. Inovasi Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji kerangka hukum komparatif terkait perkawinan paksa di Indonesia, Inggris, dan Pakistan, dengan tujuan merumuskan model reformulasi Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual (UU TPKS) agar lebih efektif dalam melindungi korban. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan tiga pendekatan utama, yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan untuk mengkaji aturan hukum yang berlaku, pendekatan konseptual untuk mengidentifikasi perlunya reformasi norma hukum, dan pendekatan komparatif untuk menganalisis persamaan dan perbedaan regulasi di ketiga negara tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia telah mengkriminalisasi perkawinan paksa sebagai salah satu bentuk kekerasan seksual dengan ancaman hukuman maksimal sembilan tahun penjara, namun belum memiliki mekanisme pencegahan dan pemulihan korban yang komprehensif. Inggris, melalui Forced Marriage Protection Orders (FMPOs) dalam Family Law Act 1996 dan Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007, menyajikan model perlindungan preventif yang progresif. Sebaliknya, Pakistan menegaskan larangan tersebut melalui Undang-Undang Pembatasan Pernikahan Anak tahun 1929 dan Undang-Undang Pencegahan Praktik Anti-Perempuan tahun 2011, meskipun implementasinya dibatasi oleh budaya patriarki. Reformulasi Undang-Undang TPKS diperlukan agar lebih preventif, responsif, dan berorientasi pada korban sesuai dengan standar hak asasi manusia internasional.
Co-Authors Dominikus Rato Sonia Wijaya Putra Triana Ohoiwutun