Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Tasyri' Pancasila Law Review
Pamungkas, Ery
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Instrumentalisasi Hukum dan Ketahanan Demokrasi: Analisis Politik Hukum Mahfud MD dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Pamungkas, Ery; Hidayati, Maslihati Nur
Tasyri' : Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Tasyri'
Publisher : STAINI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53038/tsyr.v4i1.420

Abstract

This article discusses the phenomenon of legal instrumentalization in Indonesian constitutional practice and its implications for democratic resilience, by highlighting the political thinking of Mahfud MD. Through the approach  of doctrinal legal research and normative analysis, this study found that the law is often used as an instrument of power by the dominant political configuration, thereby weakening the principles of judicial independence and constitutional supremacy. In this context, Mahfud MD's idea of responsive legal politics becomes relevant to uphold the law as a means of substantive justice, not just a tool of power legitimization. This study then relates this framework to the principles  of maqāṣid al-sharī'ah in Islamic law, especially in the aspects of the maintenance of justice (ḥifẓ al-'adl), reason (ḥifẓ al-'aql), and the public benefit (maṣlaḥah 'āmmah). The integration of the two shows that strengthening democracy requires a political reconstruction of the law based on Islamic ethical values, namely the balance between power, justice, and moral responsibility of state administrators. This study recommends the need for a national legal design that is oriented towards substantive justice and the protection of human rights as a form of application of maqāṣid al-sharī'ah in the democratic legal system in Indonesia.
The Validity Justice: Immanuel Kant's Perspective in Court Decisions on Judicial Corruption (The Case of Sudrajad Dimyati) Pamungkas, Ery; Surono, Agus; Nur Hidayati, Maslihati
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v5i4.1200

Abstract

Judicial corruption within the Indonesian judiciary represents a profound moral crisis that undermines public trust in legal institutions. This study examines the Bandung District Court Decision Number 23/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN.Bdg against Sudrajad Dimyati, a Supreme Court justice convicted of bribery, through the lens of Immanuel Kant's moral philosophy. Rather than employing conventional legal-formal analysis, this research adopts a deontological ethical approach to evaluate whether the court's verdict fulfilled substantive justice principles. The research investigates two primary questions: (1) Whether the judicial decision satisfies Kantian principles of justice regarding universality, respect for dignity, moral autonomy, and procedural fairness; and (2) How Kant's moral philosophy can inform the development of judicial professional ethics codes in Indonesian courts. This qualitative investigation employs document analysis and philosophical content analysis of the case decision and relevant moral philosophy literature. Findings demonstrate that while the verdict adhered to formal positive law requirements, significant tensions emerged regarding consistency of legal precedent when the appellate court reduced sentences based on humanitarian grounds. Most critically, the institutional system has not yet internalized moral autonomy and universal ethical principles as foundational to judicial governance. This research concludes that implementing four Kantian principles—universality, respect for dignity, moral autonomy, and procedural justice—establishes essential foundations for deontological ethics-based institutional reform of the Indonesian judicial system.
RELASI KUASA, MOBILISASI HUKUM, DAN PERLINDUNGAN PELAPOR DALAM DISFUNGSI INSTITUSI PENEGAKAN KEADILAN DI INDONESIA Pamungkas, Ery
Pancasila Law Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Pancasila Law Review

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35814/xb4xkz77

Abstract

Transformasi ekonomi digital telah membawa perubahan signifikan dalam lanskap sosial dan ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia, menghadirkan pekerja gig seperti sopir taksi online yang kerap terpapar kerentanan hukum dan sosial. Salah satu kasus menonjol ialah Haryono, sopir taksi online yang menjadi pelapor utama pembunuhan oleh oknum aparat, namun justru berujung kriminalisasi dan intimidasi. Permasalahan utama yang diangkat adalah bagaimana relasi kuasa antara aparat penegak hukum dan pelapor warga sipil mempersempit akses keadilan dan perlindungan hukum, serta seberapa efektif mekanisme mobilisasi hukum dapat memberikan saluran perlindungan dan kepastian hukum bagi korban atau saksi dalam konteks institusi peradilan yang disfungsional. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan metode sosiologi hukum kritis, membedah kasus Haryono melalui teori konflik sosial Marx dan teori mobilisasi hukum Jeff Handmaker & Sanne Taekema. Data diperoleh dari berita, dokumen hukum, serta literatur ilmiah relevan, lalu dianalisis secara reflektif dan interpretatif. Hasil temuan menunjukkan bahwa struktur kekuasaan institusional secara sistematis menghalangi akses keadilan bagi pelapor sipil, memperkuat budaya impunitas dan stigmatisasi terhadap whistleblower. Mobilisasi hukum masyarakat sipil, berperan penting sebagai counterpower dalam menantang status quo dan membuka ruang perlawanan terhadap praktik ketidakadilan. Namun, efektivitasnya sangat bergantung pada solidaritas sosial serta keberhasilan merebut kembali makna hukum demi perlindungan hak asasi di ruang publik.
Reconstruction of Indonesian Tax Law Based on The Principle Of Distributive Justice To Establish A Welfare State In The Framework of The Rule of Law Pamungkas, Ery; Samosir, Tetti; Munzil, Fontian; Hidayati, Maslihati Nur
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i2.2670

Abstract

Amidst efforts to establish a welfare state, the current tax system actually creates economic injustice through the dominance of regressive indirect taxes, asymmetric law enforcement, and a transparency deficit that weakens public legitimacy. This study uses a dogmatic research method and deeply analyzes the vertical and horizontal consistency between legal norms and tax practices. The study was conducted using a textual and conceptual approach, as well as an assessment of the harmonization of various related regulations. The results show a disharmony between the constitutional mandate demanding distributive justice and consumption tax policies and weak enforcement against corporate tax avoidance. This phenomenon is exacerbated by limited transparency and accountability in the use of tax funds, leading to a crisis of public trust. The paper recommends a comprehensive reconstruction of the tax system, including strengthening progressive taxation, equal law enforcement, increasing fiscal transparency, harmonizing regulations, and adopting international practices, so that the tax system can function optimally as an instrument for redistributing welfare in accordance with the principles of the Pancasila rule of law.
Criminal Liability For Ai-Based Cybercrime: Comparative Analysis Of Common Law And Civil Law Approaches Hidayati, Maslihati Nur; Surono, Agus; Pamungkas, Ery
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i2.2683

Abstract

This study analyzes the fundamental differences between common law and civil law systems in responding to criminal liability for artificial intelligence-based cybercrime. The background of the study covers the significant escalation of crimes utilizing AI, with 87% of global organizations experiencing AI-based attacks in 2024, AI-based fraud losses predicted to reach $40 billion by 2027, and a 223% increase in the trade of deepfake tools on dark web forums. The main problem identified by the research is a critical paradox: as AI technology becomes increasingly sophisticated in facilitating cybercrime, the gap between existing legal regulations and operational realities in the field widens, allowing criminals to exploit ambiguities in accountability to avoid responsibility. The research methodology uses a qualitative comparative legal analysis approach through analysis of primary legal documents from both systems, with case studies in four jurisdictions: the United States and the United Kingdom for common law, and Germany and France for civil law, as well as the supranational framework of the EU AI Act. The results show that the common law system has developed three models of liability—perpetration-via-another, natural-probable-consequence liability, and direct liability—but still faces fundamental difficulties in attributing mens rea to AI systems that lack moral consciousness. In contrast, civil law systems adopt a provider-deployer approach with the mechanisms of Organisationsverschulden in Germany and responsabilité pénale in France, which allow for liability based on organizational negligence, although they often lag behind in responding to technological developments. This study concludes that a hybrid approach is needed that combines the clarity of civil law codification with the adaptive flexibility of common law, as well as cross-jurisdictional harmonization to overcome the challenges of law enforcement in an increasingly autonomous AI era.
Co-Authors Agus Surono Fontian Munzil, Fontian Maslihati Nur Hidayati Nur Hidayati, Maslihati Samosir, Tetti