Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought
Ramadhani, Moch. Rafly Try
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Towards a Genealogy of Maqāṣid Al-Qur’ān: Reconstructing its Historical Development Ramadhani, Moch. Rafly Try
Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): June
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/juit.2024.2.1.1-34

Abstract

The concept of maqāṣid al-Qur’ān—the higher objectives or ultimate purposes of the Qur’anic message—has increasingly garnered scholarly attention in modern Islamic thought, particularly as part of broader efforts to renew Islamic legal and hermeneutical discourses. While contemporary scholarship often focuses on maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (the objectives of Islamic law), the distinct notion of maqāṣid al-Qur’ān remains relatively underexplored, both in its theoretical articulation and historical development. This article seeks to address that gap by offering a critical genealogy of maqāṣid al-Qur’ān, tracing its evolution from early exegetical practices to its systematic conceptualization in modern Islamic scholarship. Therefore, this article proposes a five-phase genealogical framework for the historical development of maqāṣid al-Qurʾān: (1) the Pre-Conceptual Applicative Phase; (2) the Formative-Conceptual Phase; (3) the Affirmative-Critical Phase; (4) the Transformative-Interpretative Phase; and (5) the Reformative-Theoretical Phase.
The Concept of Dihliz in the Sufi Philosophy of Kiai Achmad Asrori al-Ishaqi: Bridging Traditionality and Modernity in Religious Practices in Indonesia Wahyudi, Chafid; Zuhri, Achmad Muhibin; Yaqin, Ainul; Ramadhani, Moch. Rafly Try
Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan Vol 23 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan Vol. 23 No. 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Center for Research and Development of Religious Literature and Heritage, Agency for Research and Development and Training, Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31291/jlka.v23i2.1287

Abstract

Studies on Nusantara Sufism often treat tarekat communities as socio cultural phenomena and overlook their potential as sources of epistemological innovation. This gap limits understanding of how Sufi traditions generate knowledge that negotiates textual authority and spiritual experience. This article examines the concept of dihliz in KH Achmad Asrori al Ishaqi’s al Muntakhabat to propose a model of liminal Sufi epistemology. The study uses qualitative literature based data drawn from al Muntakhabat as the primary source, supported by secondary works on Sufism and Nusantara intellectual history. The analysis combines hermeneutics to interpret textual meaning and anthropology to situate the text as a cultural artefact, supported by Foucault’s archaeology of knowledge and Bourdieu’s theory of habitus. The findings show three key points. First, dihliz functions as an epistemic threshold that regulates the transition between sharia-based normativity and Sufi experiential knowledge. Second, it produces a hybrid epistemology that integrates rational reflection, textual authority, and intuitive insight. Third, dihliz shapes an epistemic habitus within the tarekat community, enabling the negotiation of tradition and modernity in contemporary religious practice. These findings demonstrate that dihliz offers a conceptual framework for understanding Sufism as a dynamic mode of knowledge production. The study concludes that dihliz provides a useful model for strengthening religious literacy, reconciling doctrinal differences, and supporting peace oriented Islamic education. Future research may apply this framework to other Nusantara Sufi texts to map broader patterns of liminal epistemology. 
From RTBF to Devoir de Mémoire: The Imperative of Amanah and Adālah in Regulating Former Corruption Offenders' Candidacy Santono, Agung Nugroho Reformis; Abrori, Muhammad Burhan; Azizi, Muhamad Lutfi; Ramadhani, Moch. Rafly Try
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic University of Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v19i2.15489

Abstract

The Indonesian regulation permitting ex-corruption convicts to run for public office after a five-year waiting period creates a critical normative dilemma, particularly when intersecting with the EU-centric' Right to Be Forgotten' (RTBF). This article explicitly aims to analyze and challenge the applicability of the RTBF framework to the candidacy of former corruption offenders by re-examining it through the lens of Islamic leadership ethics, specifically the principles of amanah, adālah, and fiqh siyasah. Using a normative-juridical approach, this study analyzes Indonesian electoral regulations and the RTBF doctrine, synthesized with classical and contemporary Islamic jurisprudence, with particular emphasis on Maqāshid al-Sharīʿah and the doctrine of sadd al-dharāʿīʿ. The findings reveal two key points: First, the five-year waiting period fundamentally misapplies RTBF by equating public records of corruption with private data; this article proposes its antithesis, devoir de mémoire (the duty to remember), as the required public policy framework. Second, Islamic jurisprudence establishes adālah (moral integrity) as a binding legal qualification (sharṭ) for public office, and corruption legally and perpetually nullifies this qualification. The study concludes that spiritual taubah (repentance) is distinct from public-legal qualification (ḥaqq al-ummah) and does not automatically restore eligibility. Therefore, disqualifying former corrupt officials does not violate rights but represents a necessary implementation of sadd al-dharā’iʿ to safeguard public amanah and protect the public interest.
Co-Authors Abrori, Muhammad Burhan Achmad Muhibin Zuhri Ainul Yaqin Azizi, Muhamad Lutfi Chafid Wahyudi Santono, Agung Nugroho Reformis