Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Hukum Informed Consent dalam Kasus Malpraktek dalam Praktek Estetika Studi Kasus Dokter Estetik di Kota Makassar (Analisis Putusan Nomor 441/PID.SUS/2019/PN.MKS) S. Zulfikar G.Assegaf; AL, Suardi; N, Nur Abdi Fadya H.; Mathius, Denny; Mansyur, Mauluddin; Mutaher, Annisa Anwar
JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU KEDOKTERAN Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Agustus : Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Kedokteran
Publisher : Pusat riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrike.v4i2.6012

Abstract

Malpractice has the potential to harm patients, change the perception of the public, especially patients, and ultimately lead to public demands for doctors to be held accountable for their actions because only certain acts can be punished. One of the malpractice cases that has been examined, decided and heard at the Makassar District Court is decision number 441/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Mks. In the verdict, the defendant is suspected of having committed malpractice Article 79 letter c of Junto Article 51 letter a of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice and Article 360 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. One of the cases that attracted attention was a case involving dr. ES, a doctor who was proven to cause serious harm to patients due to negligence in providing informed consent. This study uses a qualitative approach with case studies to analyze legal decisions taken in malpractice cases. This malpractice case demonstrates the importance of the application of informed consent in any medical procedure, especially in aesthetic practices involving invasive procedures.
Integrating Human Reliability Assessment into Health Promotion Strategies to Reduce Patient Mortality and Preventive to Legal Issue Assegaf, S. Zulfikar. G.; AL, Suardi; Dase, Jerny; Mutaher, Annisa Anwar; Nelwan, Berty. J; Zainuddin, Andi Alfian; Lawrence, Gatot. S.
Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI) Vol. 8 No. 12: DESEMBER 2025 - Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI)
Publisher : Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/mppki.v8i12.8567

Abstract

Introduction: Human error is one of the leading factors in medical negligence cases worldwide. These errors may include a range of actions such as misdiagnosis, medication errors, and procedural mistakes. Based on studies and reports from several major hospitals in Indonesia, as well as reports from the Hospital Patient Safety Committee (Komite Keselamatan Pasien Rumah Sakit – KKPRS), incidents related to patient safety in the ICU remain considerably high. Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) is a method used to prevent human error by analysing and assessing the likelihood of human mistakes within a work system and by developing mitigation strategies to minimise such errors. The HRA method involves several techniques and approaches that can be applied in healthcare settings to enhance patient safety and prevent medical negligence. Methods: This qualitative descriptive-exploratory study was conducted in the ICU of Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo General Hospital from January to March 2025. Thirty ICU healthcare workers were recruited through total sampling. Mortality data were reported only for contextual description, not as a direct outcome of HRA, in order to avoid conflating qualitative error mapping with quantitative outcomes. Results: ICU nurses demonstrated a higher potential for human error compared to anesthesiology residents. The ICU mortality rate was 45%, with chronic kidney disease, malignancies, and cardiovascular disorders identified as the leading causes of death. These figures are presented descriptively and not interpreted as effects of HRA Conclusion: The SHERPA approach provided insight into potential errors, their impact, and contributing factors, enabling recommendations to strengthen ICU safety systems. These findings underline the urgent need for medical audits and suggest potential implications of SHERPA in reducing medico-legal risks, rather than establishing causal effects on mortality reduction.