Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Jurnal Minuta
Salsabillah, Silfiyana
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Ekspedisi Atas Kerusakan Dalam Pengiriman Barang (Studi Kasus Shopee Express) Salsabillah, Silfiyana; Iskandar, Hardian
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1136

Abstract

In the era of electronic commerce that continues to grow, Shopee Express as one of the main players in the e-commerce industry offers efficient and fast delivery services. However, in the process of shipping goods, the risk of damage or loss is always there. This negligence is the responsibility of the expedition company, because the company has an obligation to compensate for losses experienced by consumers. These provisions are contained in Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. This research aims to analyze and determine the form of consumer protection against damage to goods in terms of business actors, the role of government up to the settlement stage. The main problem raised in this research is how to protect consumers, especially in the event of damage during the goods delivery process. The research method used in writing this article is normative legal research, data collection techniques by examining library materials or secondary data based on research results that to submit a product replacement claim, consumers are required to submit evidence in the form of photos/videos, provisions that have been made by Shopee Express and approved by the consumer when they want to make a transaction is an absolute decision and cannot be contested.
Perlindungan Hukum dan Risiko Cacat Materiil Akta bagi Klien Tunanetra dalam Ketiadaan Pengaturan UUJN Sari, Yenti Khofifah Nilam; Salsabillah, Silfiyana
JURNAL MINUTA Vol. 8 No. 01 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24123/minuta.v8i01.8463

Abstract

Law Number 8 of 2016 on Persons with Disabilities explicitly recognizes persons with disabilities, including visually impaired persons, as legal subjects who are entitled to equal legal protection and legal certainty in all aspects of life, including civil legal relations embodied in authentic deeds. This reflects the principle of equality before the law. In notarial practice, notaries serve as public officials authorized to draw up authentic deeds under the Notary Office Act (UUJN). Article 16 paragraph (1) letter m of the UUJN mandates the reading of deeds before the appearers and witnesses to ensure that the parties fully understand and consent to the content of the deed. Legal issues arise when this obligation is applied to visually impaired appearers. Visual limitations prevent them from independently verifying the written deed against the oral reading conducted by the notary, resulting in complete reliance on the notary’s professionalism and good faith. The absence of specific technical regulations governing the reading and signing of deeds for visually impaired persons creates legal uncertainty and increases the risk of material defects in authentic deeds. This situation may affect the validity of deeds, expose notaries to civil and administrative liability, and weaken the protective function of deed witnesses. This research is a normative legal study employing statutory and conceptual approaches. The study concludes that the lack of explicit procedural standards undermines substantive legal protection and legal certainty, emphasizing the urgent need for inclusive and clear regulations to ensure accountable and nondiscriminatory notarial practices.
Peran PPAT dalam Transaksi Tanah Pasca Pembentukan Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN) Salsabillah, Silfiyana; Yolanda, Ade; Sari, Yenti Khofifah Nilam
JURNAL MINUTA Vol. 8 No. 02 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24123/minuta.v8i02.8144

Abstract

The Land Deed Official (PPAT) is a public official authorized to draw up authentic deeds related to the transfer of land rights, serving a key role in providing legal certainty in land affairs. Following the enactment of Law Number 3 of 2022 on the National Capital (IKN) and the establishment of the IKN Authority, the role of PPAT encounters new challenges. The IKN Authority is vested with special powers to regulate and manage land in the IKN area, which may cause dualism of authority with the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN) and raise questions about PPAT’s position in land transactions. This study analyzes the role of PPAT in IKN land transactions through the perspectives of legal certainty, justice, legal protection, and progressive law. The findings reveal that while PPAT still functions as the maker of authentic deeds, normative gaps and potential overlaps exist between the authority of the IKN Authority and ATR/BPN. Administrative issues also emerge, including double bureaucracy and the lack of clear technical regulations, undermining both legal certainty and service effectiveness for the public and investors. The study argues that PPAT’s role in IKN should not be limited to formal deed-making but also extended as an agent of legal protection, ensuring a balance between development priorities and social justice. Accordingly, synchronization between the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), ATR/BPN regulations, and IKN Authority provisions is urgently required to safeguard legal certainty and protect community rights in IKN development. Keywords: Land Deed Official, IKN Authority, Land Transactions, Legal Certainty, Legal Protection.
Kedudukan Girik Dan Tanah Hak Ulayat Sebagai Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Pendaftaran Tanah Tahun 2026 Putri, Septya Luckyana; Arief, Sulfa Chintia; Yenti Khofifah Nilam Sari; Yolanda, Ade; Salsabillah, Silfiyana; Angel; Hardjo, David
JURNAL MINUTA Vol. 8 No. 02 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24123/minuta.v8i02.8489

Abstract

The national agrarian law system relies on land registration as a crucial tool to guarantee land rights are protected and to provide legal certainty. In Indonesia, land tenure is still frequently based on traditional evidentiary instruments such as girik and communal land rights (hak ulayat) of indigenous communities that have not been fully integrated into the national land registration system. Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021, as an implementing regulation of the Basic Agrarian Law, strengthens the direction of agrarian legal policy toward accelerated land certification and simplified evidentiary mechanisms by establishing 2026 as the normative deadline for the use of former customary land documents. The legitimacy of girik and hak ulayat as proof in land registration and conversion procedures, and the state's legal safeguards for such evidence, are the subjects of this study. Evidence of land ownership, such as girik and hak ulayat, is now seen as indicative evidence that needs to be backed up by physical possession, witness statements, and administrative verification; this is according to the results of a normative legal study that used statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. On the other hand, as long as indigenous groups are recognized legally, Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 offers legal protection via a cautious, transparent, and progressive process of converting land rights, which includes acknowledging community land rights. The land registration policy toward 2026 reflects the state’s effort to balance formal legal certainty with the protection of traditional land rights within the framework of agrarian justice.
Co-Authors Angel Arief, Sulfa Chintia Hardian Iskandar Hardjo, David Putri, Septya Luckyana Sari, Yenti Khofifah Nilam Yenti Khofifah Nilam Sari Yolanda, Ade