Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PEMAHAMAN SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DALAM PRAKTIK PERSIDANGAN KEPADA WARGA BINAAN RUMAH TAHANAN KELAS 1 SALEMBA Firmansyah, Hery; Hugo Feris Tri Susanto; Cesilia Aprianes; George Daniel Pangaribuan; Egieta Christy Tarigan; Amelia Abdullah Zimah
Jurnal Serina Abdimas Vol 3 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Serina Abdimas
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/jsa.v3i3.35527

Abstract

The criminal justice system in Indonesia plays a central role in ensuring justice and protecting the human rights of every citizen. However, in practice, this system often faces various structural issues, such as the limited legal assistance for defendants, the inequality of position between prosecutors and legal advisors, as well as the dominance of formal aspects in trials. The Community Service Program (PKM) conducted by the Faculty of Law at Tarumanagara University through the Legal Consultation and Assistance Center (PKBH) aims to enhance legal understanding and awareness among the inmates at Rutan Salemba, Central Jakarta. In this community service activity, the method applied is legal counseling through material presentation, interactive discussions, and legal consultations conducted in person, so that the participants not only receive information but also express the legal issues they are facing. The results of this counseling activity indicate that many participants still do not adequately understand their legal rights, particularly regarding the trial process and the importance of legal assistance. This activity reinforces the importance of the state's presence in ensuring legal aid for marginalized groups and the need to strengthen coordination among law enforcement agencies. The conclusion of this activity shows that practice-based legal education has a tangible positive impact in raising legal awareness among participants, and serves as a concrete step towards promoting a fair, inclusive, and oriented towards substantive justice. ABSTRAK Sistem peradilan pidana yang berlaku di Indonesia memainkan peran sentral dalam menjamin tegaknya keadilan sekaligus perlindungan hak asasi bagi setiap Warga Negara. Namun seringkali dalam praktiknya, sistem ini masih dihadapkan pada beragam persoalan yang struktural, seperti keterbatasan pendampingan hukum bagi terdakwa, ketimpangan posisi antara jaksa dan penasihat hukum, serta dominasi aspek formal dalam persidangan. Kegiatan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (PKM) yang dilaksanakan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara melalui Pusat Konsultasi dan Bantuan Hukum (PKBH) memiliki tujuan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman serta wawasan hukum kepada warga binaan di Rutan Salemba, Jakarta Pusat. Dalam kegiatan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat ini, metode yang diterapkan berupa penyuluhan hukum melalui pemaparan materi, diskusi interaktif, dan konsultasi hukum yang dilaksanakan secara langsung, sehingga para warga binaan tidak hanya menerima informasi, namun juga menyampaikan persoalan hukum yang mereka hadapi.. Hasil pada kegiatan penyuluhan ini menunjukkan bahwa banyaknya warga binaan yang masih belum memahami hak-hak hukum mereka secara memadai, khususnya terkait pada proses persidangan dan pentingnya pendampingan hukum. Kegiatan ini mempertegas pentingnya kehadiran negara dalam menjamin bantuan hukum bagi kelompok marjinal serta perlunya penguatan koordinasi antar lembaga penegak hukum. Kesimpulan dari kegiatan ini menunjukkan bahwa edukasi hukum yang berbasis praktik memiliki dampak nyata secara positif dalam meningkatkan kesadaran hukum bagi warga binaan, serta menjadi langkah nyata secara konkret dalam mendorong sistem peradilan yang adil, inklusif, serta berorientasi kepada keadilan yang substantif.
Demonstration and Response of Legislators to Legal Positivism Leonardi; Amelia Abdullah Zimah; Febriany; Fayola Bearminta Chandra; Vennia Neshya Rusli
Tarumanagara Law Review Vol. 7 No. II (2025): Talrev-Untar
Publisher : Faculty of Law Tarumanagara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/talrev.v7iII.38942

Abstract

This study analyzes the response of Indonesian legislators to public demonstrations, particularly those resulting in the loss of life, through the lens of legal positivism. Although demonstrations are a constitutional right guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution and Law No. 9 of 1998, tension exists between the people's aspirations for substantive justice and the legislators' legal-formalist perspective. Adhering to legal positivism, legislators tend to prioritize legal certainty and public order over the substance of demands. As a result, the validity of demonstrations is seen solely in terms of procedural compliance, rather than in terms of the justice they are fighting for. More fatally, the legislators' response focuses more on the violations of the law by the demonstrators and the justification of the authorities' actions based on existing regulations, rather than on the state's failure to protect the right to life. This approach instrumentalizes the law as a shield of power and creates a legitimacy deficit. This study highlights the importance of shifting toward a more responsive and integrative legal paradigm, in line with the thinking of Gustav Radbruch and Satjipto Rahardjo, which balances legal certainty with justice and social benefit to realize a state based on the rule of law that fundamentally protects human rights.