Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Ninin Armianti Natsir
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tindakan Represif Aparat Penegak Hukum dalam Aksi Unjuk Rasa terhadap Kebijakan Pemerintahan Prabowo dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Ninin Armianti Natsir; Santy Isma Handikasari; Nurul Fajriani; Ryan Asprimagama; Surez Taruna Pramata; Insan Tajali Nur
Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): November: Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/federalisme.v2i4.1253

Abstract

Our country is known as a nation that upholds human rights values. This is manifested in the recognition of the right to express opinions, which is specifically regulated in Law Number 9 of 1998 concerning Freedom of Expression in Public. Along with the increasing dynamics of political contestation and polarization in society, the frequency of demonstrations has also escalated. This condition places the professionalism and neutrality of the police force under increasing public scrutiny. The reduction in citizens' freedom to express their aspirations often creates a negative image of the police, particularly due to repressive actions and the use of discretion that is deemed disproportionate. Based on a normative juridical approach, this study aims to analyze the extent to which the state upholds access and protection of freedom of expression in public, as well as examine the application of human rights principles from both national and international legal perspectives in demonstrations
Res Judicata Pro Veritate Habetur dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Proses Praperadilan yang Memeriksa Materi Pokok Perkara Ninin Armianti Natsir; Rosmini Rosmini; La Syarifuddin
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni: Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v4i2.2542

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the pretrial examination mechanism, which also assesses the substance of the case, as reflected in Pretrial Decision Number 10/Pid.Pra/2020/PN.Lbo at the Limboto District Court. The method used in this study is normative legal research, applying a statute approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The analysis is conducted qualitatively through deductive reasoning, namely by explaining general legal provisions and then drawing more specific conclusions.The results indicate that Pretrial Decision Number 10/Pid.Pra/2020/PN.Lbo, specifically the ruling declaring the Petitioner's actions not a criminal act of corruption, is deemed inconsistent with the nature and scope of pretrial proceedings. This is because pretrial examinations are principally intended only to examine formal aspects with a brief examination process, and therefore should not include an assessment of the subject matter of the case. Furthermore, the lack of a legal remedy mechanism for the pretrial decision also raises issues of legal certainty. In fact, based on the principle of res judicata pro veritate habetur, every court decision must be considered correct, valid, and binding until there is a decision from a higher court that overturns the decision.
Co-Authors Insan Tajali Nur La Syarifuddin Nurul Fajriani Rosmini Rosmini Ryan Asprimagama Santy Isma Handikasari Surez Taruna Pramata