Arsyanika Nhayla Ananda
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Normatif Hak-Hak Warga Binaan Dalam Sistem Pemasyarakatan Indonesia: Tinjauan Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Dan Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana Arsyanika Nhayla Ananda; Amelia Saputri; Ganefi
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Oktober - Desember
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the provisions on prisoners' rights in Law Number 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections and their compliance with the principles of criminal law, namely proportionality, human dignity, and the rule of law. The research background stems from various correctional problems in Indonesia, such as overcrowding, violence, discrimination, and lack of access to basic services, which often result in violations of prisoners' rights. This study uses normative legal methods by examining statutory regulations, criminal law principles, and correctional theory. The results show that Law Number 22 of 2022 regulates prisoners' rights more comprehensively through Articles 9 and 10, covering basic rights and integration rights, with the aim of supporting rehabilitation and social reintegration. Furthermore, the provisions in the law align with the principle of proportionality through measurable rights restrictions, the principle of human dignity through guarantees of humane treatment and prohibitions on violence, and the principle of the rule of law through clear legal procedures and oversight mechanisms. However, the implementation of the regulations still faces structural challenges in the field, necessitating the need for comprehensive strengthening of the correctional system
Korupsi Sebagai Patologi Sosial Sistemik Di Indonesia Dan Kegagalan Hukum Pidana Dalam Menciptakan Efek Jera Saputri, Amelia; Annisya Nurhasanah; Arsyanika Nhayla Ananda; Indri Kurnia Saputri; Wevy Efticha Sary
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Oktober - Desember
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia can no longer be understood merely as individual legal violations but has evolved into a systemic social pathology that is continuously reproduced through mechanisms of social anomie, dysfunctional social control, and the weakness of criminal law institutions. This normative juridical research analyses why corruption-related criminal law, despite imposing severe penalties up to life imprisonment and the death penalty, persistently fails to break the chain of reproduction of corrupt behaviour. Employing Robert K. Merton’s anomie theory, Emile Durkheim’s theory of social pathology, and Sudarto–Barda Nawawi Arief’s concept of criminal law dysfunction, the study concludes that corruption has become an alternative norm among bureaucratic and political elites, limited reverse proof (Article 37 of the Anti-Corruption Law) and the rare imposition of minimum sentences eliminate deterrent effects, while impunity for corporate actors and politically exposed persons reinforces structural anomie. The research recommends the adoption of full reverse proof, elimination of prosecutorial discretion under Article 4 of the Anti-Corruption Law, and stricter corporate criminal liability provisions in the new Criminal Code that will be gradually implemented from 2026 onward.