Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal el-Sunnah: Jurnal Kajian Hadis dan Integrasi Ilmu
Ali Masrur
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Critical Analysis of Hadith Regarding Investment Ethics Standards: Examining Authenticity and Relevance Kintabuwana, Kardita; Ali Masrur; Tajul Arifin
el-Sunnah: Jurnal Kajian Hadis dan Integrasi Ilmu Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): el-Sunnah: Jurnal Kajian Hadis dan Integrasi Ilmu
Publisher : The Hadith Department, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought, State Islamic University of Raden Fatah Palembang.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/elsunnah.v6i2.30047

Abstract

The volatile global economy necessitates ethical investment frameworks, where Islamic finance offers a unique values-based model. However, a significant gap persists in the literature: the rigorous application of Hadith criticism to authenticate and contextualize the prophetic traditions underpinning Islamic investment ethics. This study addresses this by critically examining key hadith concerning Islamic ethical standards like riba, gharar, and maysir, and principles of justice. This research aims to demonstrate how critically authenticated hadith can be effectively applied in modern Islamic financial products and policies, fostering greater transparency and ethical integrity. Employing a qualitative library research approach with content and historical-critical analysis, we apply hadith criticism methodologies—including jarh wa ta'dil, sanad analysis, matn criticism, and ilal al-hadith—to selected texts from canonical collections. The findings of this study indicate that the majority of the key hadiths analyzed are classified as either sahih or at least hasan, thereby providing a strong and authoritative normative foundation for the formulation of Islamic investment ethical standards and enabling their practical application in the modern Islamic finance industry. The main contribution of this research lies in integrating the tradition of Hadith scholarship with the practice of Islamic economic ethics, a connection that has thus far been underexplored in academic literature. Ultimately, this study proposes a methodologically sound framework of Islamic investment ethics, bridging traditional Hadith studies with contemporary finance to promote a more resilient and ethical global financial system.
Comparative Epistemology of Hadith Criticism: A Paradigmatic Analysis between the Textual Tradition and the Rational Tradition Hikmawati, Ike; Ali Masrur; Tajul Arifin
el-Sunnah: Jurnal Kajian Hadis dan Integrasi Ilmu Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): el-Sunnah: Jurnal Kajian Hadis dan Integrasi Ilmu
Publisher : The Hadith Department, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought, State Islamic University of Raden Fatah Palembang.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/elsunnah.v6i2.30328

Abstract

This study critically analyzes the epistemological foundations of hadith criticism, examining the paradigmatic conflict between the textualist Ahl al-Hadith and the rationalist Ahl al-Ra’yi/Kalam traditions. This topic is vital as it addresses the core tension between tradition and reason in Islamic thought, a debate that remains highly relevant in contemporary contexts, especially regarding hadith’s authenticity and its compatibility with modern knowledge. The research uses a qualitative, library-based comparative analysis to scrutinize the methodologies of both traditions, focusing on their respective primary sources of authority, criticism criteria, and validity standards. The research findings indicate that both paradigms possess complementary strengths and weaknesses: the textual paradigm excels in historical authenticity but lacks rational coherence, while the rational paradigm emphasizes theological consistency and universal Islamic values yet tends toward subjectivity. Both represent distinct but mutually corrective approaches to understanding prophetic truth. This study's key contribution is a proposal for a comprehensive critical epistemology that integrates the historical rigor of sanad criticism with the rational scrutiny of matn. This hybrid framework offers a balanced and accountable approach to hadith criticism, bridging the historical gap and ensuring its continued relevance for modern scholarship and believers.
Co-Authors Hikmawati, Ike Kintabuwana, Kardita Tajul Arifin