Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education
Annabella Marcella Geraldine Kandou
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS MENGENAI ‘ASEAN WAY’ TIDAK EFEKTIF MENANGANI PERDAGANGAN MANUSIA DI ASEAN Annabella Marcella Geraldine Kandou; Rico Arden Kusuma; Immanuel C. E. Wurangian; Leslie Glori Julio Mandibondibo; Leonardo Nathanael Morong
Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) Vol. 3 No. 12 (2025): JURNAL MEDIA AKADEMIK Edisi Desember
Publisher : PT. Media Akademik Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62281/88s0e881

Abstract

Perdagangan manusia di Asia Tenggara masih menjadi masalah serius meskipun ASEAN telah meratifikasi ACTIP sejak 2015. Penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana prinsip ASEAN Way, seperti non-intervensi dan konsensus yang mempengaruhi implementasi ACTIP dalam memberantas tindak pidana perdagangan orang (TPPO). Pendekatan kualitatif-deskriptif digunakan dengan studi dokumen dan fokus pada Indonesia, Thailand, dan Filipina sebagai negara asal, transit, dan tujuan. Hasil temuan menunjukkan bahwa ACTIP cenderung bersifat soft law tanpa daya paksa hukum, sehingga efektivitas implementasinya sangat bergantung pada komitmen politik domestik. ASEAN Way, yang menjaga stabilitas kawasan, justru membatasi kapasitas kolektif ASEAN dalam menangani kejahatan lintas negara seperti TPPO. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan bahasa hukum ACTIP, pengecualian prinsip non-intervensi dalam kasus pelanggaran HAM berat, serta pembentukan lembaga pengawasan regional yang independen. Diperlukan transformasi pendekatan ASEAN menuju flexible engagement dan prinsip Responsibility to Protect (R2P) agar dapat merespons isu kemanusiaan secara lebih efektif.
A Legal Review of Roasting Actions by Comedians from the Perspective of Positive Law on Reputation Protection in Indonesia Joshua Evandeo Irawan; Annabella Marcella Geraldine Kandou; Andrew Johnathan Setia; Sari Mandiana
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/iccle.v7i3.35846

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications of roasting in stand-up comedy from the perspective of Indonesian positive law, particularly in relation to the protection of reputation, dignity, and honor. Roasting, as a comedic technique involving satirical criticism often directed at public figures, raises legal concerns when it potentially infringes upon the personal rights of those being criticized. This research employs a normative-dogmatic legal method using legislative and conceptual approaches to analyze the applicable legal framework, including the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE), and the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP). The analysis is grounded in legal protection theory and the principle of legal utility, emphasizing that while freedom of expression constitutes a fundamental human right, it must be balanced against the rights to privacy and reputation. The findings indicate that defamation under Indonesian law constitutes a complaint-based offense, whereby legal proceedings may only be initiated upon a report by the injured party. Consequently, roasting conducted with the explicit consent of the subject, supported by a prior agreement regarding content and delivery, does not constitute an element of a criminal offense. This study proposes the use of written contracts between comedians and their subjects as a preventive legal mechanism to ensure legal certainty and minimize potential disputes. Ultimately, the study concludes that roasting, when appropriately regulated and based on mutual consent, can coexist with legal norms safeguarding individual dignity, thereby harmonizing freedom of expression with the right to reputation.
Co-Authors Andrew Johnathan Setia Immanuel C. E. Wurangian Joshua Evandeo Irawan Leonardo Nathanael Morong Leslie Glori Julio Mandibondibo Rico Arden Kusuma Sari Mandiana