Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Termination of employment without an official letter: A juridical review of employee protection under the manpower act and the job creation act Lingga, Ebenni; Siregar, Hisar
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i11.1018

Abstract

This Study Carefully Examines the legal validity  of the protections and guarantees provided by the laws of employees who may lose their jobs without receiving formal written notice. There is a notable disparity: despite the regulatory framework (Law 13/2003,Law 6/2023 on job creation,and PP 35/2021) expressly requiring written procedures, unilateral verbal dismissal remains common. These acts essentially constitute the legal principle,the protective principle (in favorem laboris),and the procedural justice doctrine. Using statutes,conceptual, comparative,and case approaches, this study employs a normative legal methodology. This study focuses on the particular factual case of Novita Sari Naibaho. This analysis is further supported by a review of pertinent jurisprudence to analyze the legal implications,particularly the Serang Industrial Relations Court decision(No.21/Pdt. Sus-PHI/PHI/2025/PN.SRG). The discussion shows that the absence of a formal written notification renders the entire termination process invalid. This study concludes that any dismissal that does not comply with this crucial formal requirement is illegal. In the absence of a final,legally binding court decision,it is implied that the employment relationship is continuous, and the employee retains their full entitlement to all normative rights.
Legal Liability of Securities Crowdfunding Platforms in Protecting Digital Investors: An Analysis of POJK No. 17 of 2025 Lingga, Ebenni; Martono Anggusti; Ria Juliana Siregar
Al-Risalah VOLUME 26 NO 1, MAY (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.66505

Abstract

The Study aims to analyze the obligations of Securties Crowdfunding platform operators in omplementing due diligence and anti fraud strategiws, as well as ti determine the limits of their leal liability for investor losses under POJK Number 17 of 2025 and POJK Number  12 of 2025. This research employs a normative juridical method with statue and conceptual approach, supported by digital documentation studies and limited digital observation to examine the alignments between legal norms and their practical implementation. The finding that platform operatos play a strategyc role as gatekeepers in ensurig transoparency and investor protection through the implementation of due diligence and anti fraud mechanisms.However, in practice, these obligations have not been optimally in preventing post disbursement fraud, futhermore, a regulatory gap is identified regarding the absence of obligation to verify investor,s source of funds, This studry concludes that platform liability is conditional and must be determined base on the analysis of the causes of loss potentially extending ti civil, admnistrative. And criminal lability in the cases of negligence or legal violations.