Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS)
Amancik
Unknown Affiliation
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
RECONSTRUCTING THE STATUS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RESEARCHERS: MEREKONSTRUKSI STATUS PENELITI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSIONAL Barus, Sonia Ivana; Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad; Amancik; Nikenuna, Syifa
Constitutional Law Society Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Pusat Studi Konstitusi dan Perundang-undangan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/jcls.v5i1.143

Abstract

Researchers at state institutions were forced to leave their positions, including those at the Constitutional Court. Researchers then lose the opportunity to hold the title of research professor. These researchers were also given a new duty, which was to help courts and give Constitutional Justices substantial support. The predicate “assistance" in this rule, which receives no detailed explanation, leads to multiple interpretations and affects the productivity of assistants to expert constitutional judges. Based on this, it is interesting to discuss how the status quo regulates career paths and academic freedom of Constitutional Court researchers in personnel law and how the ideal concept of setting career paths and academic freedom for researchers at the Constitutional Court. This study uses a normative research method, in which its results implicitly suggest a return to the previous rules. The researcher also suggests that the positions of assistant judge and researcher be strictly separated and that opportunities be provided for researchers to hold the title of academic professor. Researchers think BRIN should merge research institutions with the same form and function.
LEGAL REVIEW OF THE EXPANSION OF PAPUA PROVINCE INTO THREE NEW PROVINCES BASED ON LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 21 OF 2001 CONCERNING SPECIAL AUTONOMY FOR PAPUA PROVINCE Indrajaya, Reyhanka Abid Putera; Amancik; Satmaidi, Edra
Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jbengkoelenjust.v15i2.45203

Abstract

In 2022, Papua Province was divided into three new provinces: South Papua, Central Papua, and Papua. This regional expansion raised legal concerns, particularly regarding unmet technical requirements and the limited consideration of the aspirations of the Papuan People’s Assembly (MRP) and the Papuan Regional House of Representatives (DRP) as representatives of indigenous Papuans. This study analyzes the legal considerations and implications of the expansion. This normative juridical research applies statutory and comparative approaches supported by literature review. Legal materials include primary legislation, secondary sources such as books and journals, and tertiary materials from online sources. The findings indicate that the government based the expansion on philosophical, sociological, and juridical considerations. Philosophically, it aimed to realize the third and fifth principles of Pancasila. Sociologically, it sought to enhance welfare, development, and security in Papua. Juridically, it referred to Article 18B of the 1945 Constitution. However, shortcomings were identified, including a rushed process, limited accommodation of local aspirations, and potential inconsistency with Article 35A of Law No. 23 of 2014. Despite these issues, the special autonomy status remains applicable to the newly established provinces.
Co-Authors Barus, Sonia Ivana Edra Satmaidi Indrajaya, Reyhanka Abid Putera Nikenuna, Syifa Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad