Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Ismi Arinal Mufidati
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Hukum Tanah dan Kewarganegaraan dalam Perkawinan Silang di Indonesia Naila Nurazizah; Ahmad Ashfannawa Fauza; Ismi Arinal Mufidati
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i6.1370

Abstract

Cross-national marriages between Indonesian citizens and foreign nationals generate complex legal issues concerning land ownership and citizenship. The Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) and Citizenship Law No. 12 of 2006 have yet to harmonize their provisions regarding property rights within mixed-nationality marriages. This study aims to analyze the interrelation between land law and citizenship in cross-national marriages and evaluate their legal certainty. The research employs a normative-empirical approach by reviewing statutory regulations, case law, and interviews with land officials. The findings reveal a normative conflict between the prohibition of land ownership by foreign nationals and the constitutional right of Indonesian citizens married to foreigners to acquire joint property rights. Such disharmony leads to legal uncertainty and potential violations of property rights. The study concludes that reforming Indonesia’s land and citizenship law is crucial to accommodate international marriage dynamics and ensure legal certainty for all citizens.
Sengketa Hak Asuh Anak di Pengadilan Agama: Rekonstruksi Prinsip Kepentingan Terbaik Anak Berbasis Pancasila dan Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence Theory Evelyn Hatiku; Ismi Arinal Mufidati; Ayu Dwi Kusuma Wardani; Ahmad Muhamad Mustain Nasoha
Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni: Presidensial : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/presidensial.v3i2.1754

Abstract

Child custody disputes in Indonesia’s Religious Courts constitute a significant domain of Islamic family law, particularly given the escalating rate of marital dissolution and the increasingly complex social fabric of contemporary society. In practice, decisions regarding custody (ḥaḑānah) remain largely anchored in normative-textual paradigms—such as the child’s age or the presumed primacy of maternal care—without holistically evaluating the principle of the best interests of the child. This gap between legal norms, Pancasila values, and the lived realities of Indonesian families calls for critical reassessment. This research seeks to reconstruct the best interests of the child principle within Religious Court proceedings through an integrative framework that draws upon Pancasila values and Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence theory. A qualitative methodology combining normative-juridical and socio-legal approaches is employed, encompassing statutory analysis, judicial decision review, and engagement with relevant scholarly literature. Findings indicate that the application of the best interests principle remains fragmented, insufficiently addressing psychological, sociological, and cultural dimensions. The proposed reconstruction foregrounds the integration of humanitarian values, social justice, and divine principles enshrined in Pancasila alongside a contextually adaptive Islamic legal methodology. This envisions judges not merely as law appliers, but as agents of social equity who champion the comprehensive well-being of children. This study concludes that a reconstructive paradigm grounded in Pancasila and Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence can substantially enhance child rights protection and facilitate judicial outcomes that are more equitable, compassionate, and oriented toward children’s flourishing.
Co-Authors Ahmad Ashfannawa Fauza Ahmad Muhamad Mustain Nasoha Ayu Dwi Kusuma Wardani Evelyn Hatiku Naila Nurazizah