Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal TAZKIR: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial dan Keislaman PAEDAGOGIE
Prasetyo, Nabil Tito
Unknown Affiliation
Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pemenuhan Hak Anak Setelah Lahir Melalui Tahnik dan Aqiqah: Kajian Fiqh dan Pendidikan Islam Erliyana, Erliyana; Prasetyo, Nabil Tito; Kholid, Idham; Ghazi, Fachrul; Erlina, Erlina
Tazkir: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial dan Keislaman Vol 11, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/tazkir.v11i2.17688

Abstract

This study explores tahnik and aqiqah as expressions of fulfilling children's rights within the framework of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) and Islamic education. Both are classified as sunnah muakkadah practices that hold not only ritual significance but also deep spiritual, social, and pedagogical values. The aim is to analyze how these practices function as early educational media to instill monotheism, compassion, and moral responsibility from birth. This research employs a library-based approach with thematic analysis of classical and contemporary sources. Findings indicate that tahnik serves as the child’s first spiritual education, introducing faith and parental affection, while aqiqah embodies gratitude, social care, and character formation. The integration of fiqh and tarbiyah Islamiyah highlights that fulfilling children’s rights in Islam begins at birth through spiritually and educationally meaningful practices. The study underscores the importance of revitalizing the meaning of tahnik and aqiqah beyond tradition, as integral instruments for nurturing morality and spirituality in Muslim families.
Analisis Perbandingan Model Desain Pembelajaran ADDIE dan Dick & Carey dalam Pengembangan Pembelajaran Amriyah, Chairul; Andrini, Mike; Sutriani, Ikat; Kurniawati, Elly; Prasetyo, Nabil Tito; Jatmiko, Agus; Meriyati, Meriyati
Paedagogie Vol 21 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/paedagogie.v21i1.16449

Abstract

This study is motivated by the limited number of studies that specifically analyze the comparison between the ADDIE instructional design model and the Dick & Carey model, even though both models play an important role in improving the quality of instructional planning. This study aims to analyze and compare the characteristics, development stages, and advantages of the two instructional design models in the development of learning. This study uses a qualitative approach with a library research method. Data were obtained from various scientific literature sources such as books, journals, research articles, and academic documents that discuss instructional design models. The collected data were then analyzed using descriptive qualitative analysis with a comparative approach to identify the similarities and differences between the ADDIE model and the Dick & Carey model. The results of the study show that both models apply a systematic approach in designing instruction, but they differ in terms of complexity and development structure. The ADDIE model has five main stages that are flexible and relatively simple, making it easier to apply in various learning contexts. Meanwhile, the Dick & Carey model consists of ten more detailed and comprehensive stages and emphasizes the integration of learning objectives, instructional strategies, materials, and evaluation. This study concludes that the selection of an instructional design model needs to be adjusted to the objectives and the complexity of the learning being designed. The findings of this study are expected to provide a theoretical contribution to the study of instructional design and serve as a practical reference for educators in selecting an appropriate instructional design model. Future research is recommended to conduct empirical studies to test the effectiveness of both models in classroom learning practices.
Co-Authors Agus Jatmiko Andrini, Mike Chairul Amriyah Elly Kurniawati Erlina Erlina Erliyana, Erliyana Fachrul Ghazi, Fachrul Idham Kholid Meriyati Meriyati Sutriani, Ikat